L. Scott Johnson#
chr...@netcom.com (Chrome Sync) writes:
>/...Psionic.../ (psi...@globalone.vircom.com) wrote:
>: A question about the Monocle of Clarity....
>: What if the one you use it against just plain DOES'NT do what he's supposed
>: ot?
>: Is there a penalty, besides summary execution, that can be brought against
>: him?
>Cut off a finger.
>Seriously, if it was intentional (they basically say "screw you" after
>you point out their error in action), they forfeit the game. I suggest
>that the "prize" pool (six pool, normally) be split between their
>predator and the person they lied to.
>Of course, if they cannot keep the terms, by no fault of their own,
>no foul. That is, if they indicated they'd attack on their turn, then
>their vamp(s) go to torpor by the acts of others, they're not liable.
>That's my house rule, anyway.
Cheating is cheating. Summary execution is too good for 'em :-).
If they can't follow the rules, what's to keep them from simply
moving pool from the bank to their own pool?