remove from play / game

I have a quetion about 2 terms : "remove from play" and "remove from game" Where go a vampire remove from play ? ( ash heap ? ) Can i use possession on a vampire which were remove from play ? Thank Magus --------------------------- Return to Innocence, The Card Text: (D) Bleed. If you successfully bleed your prey for one or more, put this card on the acting vampire. Burn this card if this vampire loses any blood or goes to torpor, or if your prey is ousted. During your next untap, this vampire is removed from play and your prey burns X pool, where X is the capacity of this vampire. ------------------------------ Golconda: Inner Peace Card Text: Choose a vampire with a capacity above 7. Remove that vampire from the game. His or her controller gains pool equal to the vampire's capacity. The controller may cancel this card by burning 2 pool --------------------------------

laurent Barthet wrote: > I have a quetion about 2 terms : > "remove from play" and "remove from game" > Where go a vampire remove from play ? ( ash heap ? ) The two phrases mean the same thing: move the card to someplace out of the game -- meaning that, for game purposes, the card no longer exists. > Can i use possession on a vampire which were remove from play ? No. Nothing in the game can retrieve or otherwise affect a card that has been removed from the game. -- That is my story, be it bitter or be it sweet. Keep a little and let a little come back to me. LSJ (vtesr...@TRAPwhite-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep (remove spam trap to reply) http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Don't know how long you have been playing but just in case you are spending some time on a deck concept, Return to Innocence is banned I believe. [ quoted text not captured ]

adam....@gmail.com wrote: > Don't know how long you have been playing but just in case you are > spending some time on a deck concept, Return to Innocence is banned I > believe. I've been playing quite a while, actually. And I didn't mention RtI. :-) I don't know how long you've been posting (could probably find out with Google), but in general, you should reply to the post you're addressing (or at least indicate that you're replying to someone else). :-) And you shouldn't top-post. :-) (More smilies liberally sprinkled throughout) [ quoted text not captured ]

Well LSJ, you know I was referring to laurent Barthet. But I'll watch that posting thing. Sorry.

<adam....@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1136825509.7...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Well LSJ, you know I was referring to laurent Barthet. But I'll watch > that posting thing. Sorry. > I guess this points out one advantage of not quoting. (Maybe the only advantage?) You can't be accused of top-posting. ;) - Pat