rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

[LSJ] Prophecies Questions - No Spoilers

5 messages from 4 participants · 12 March 2004 – 16 March 2004
original thread on Google Groups

kushiel

LSJ: 1) What are we to do if the incorrect number of people show up for a night of league play? If we have three or six people, are we just not allowed to have league games? 2) At last week's league, we counted any actions granted by the weekly league special rule(s) to be a "card in play" for reasons of NRA. Was that correct, or can you use any action granted by a Prophecy special rule multiply (assuming it doesn't also fall under the aegis of bleeding or calling a political action)? Thanks. John Eno Prince of Pittsburgh (almost...Mr. Pilhatsch, are you reading this?)

Raille

[ quoted text not captured ] The league is not official tournament play. Sit tables of 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 or what ever your comfortable with. Raille

LSJ

kushiel wrote: > LSJ: > > 1) What are we to do if the incorrect number of people show up for a > night of league play? If we have three or six people, are we just not > allowed to have league games? Play a 6 (or two 3's, if that's your thing). > 2) At last week's league, we counted any actions granted by the weekly > league special rule(s) to be a "card in play" for reasons of NRA. Was > that correct, or can you use any action granted by a Prophecy special > rule multiply (assuming it doesn't also fall under the aegis of bleeding > or calling a political action)? Probably best to treat them as cards in play, yes. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Joshua Duffin

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:4051FA09...@white-wolf.com... > kushiel wrote: > > LSJ: > > 2) At last week's league, we counted any actions granted by the weekly > > league special rule(s) to be a "card in play" for reasons of NRA. Was > > that correct, or can you use any action granted by a Prophecy special > > rule multiply (assuming it doesn't also fall under the aegis of bleeding > > or calling a political action)? > > Probably best to treat them as cards in play, yes. Hmmm, since they are not *actually* cards in play, I would have assumed that special Prophecies rules were not subject to "card in play" NRA restrictions as they "in effect" add to or change the default rules of the game they apply to. I'll take your advice that they should be treated as cards in play, but it would have been more clear to write the rules as "once per turn" if that was the intent. :-) Josh cannot make his time

LSJ

Joshua Duffin wrote: > "LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message >>Probably best to treat them as cards in play, yes. > > Hmmm, since they are not *actually* cards in play, I would have assumed > that special Prophecies rules were not subject to "card in play" NRA > restrictions as they "in effect" add to or change the default rules of > the game they apply to. "Probably best..." You're free to treat them as you wish in the league that you run. [ quoted text not captured ]