Frederick Scott#
This happened today at the Phoenix Imperator Storyline:
Player B used an Imperator Deck Malkavian Dementia to steal her
predator's (Player A's) Lucian. During the intervening turn,
Player A had the opportunity to oust Player B but inquired what
would become of Lucian. It seemed to me I had remember some
special rule or rules or ruling about the disposition of a
temporarily-controlled card but could find none and was forced
to conclude that Lucian would be removed from the game and
returned to Player A's deck after the end of the game. (The
reverse, if Player A were ousted, appears to result in Lucian
being removed from the game at the start of Player B's next
turn.)
Given that ruling, Player A chose not to pursue Player B's oust
that particular turn.
Did I have a brain fart and screw up or was that the correct
ruling?
Fred