rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Fame/Chantry/Talbot's Chainsaw combination?

9 messages from 7 participants · 06 April 1995 – 11 April 1995
original thread on Google Groups

CurtAdams

cr...@Ra.MsState.Edu (Charles Richard Robb) writes: Patrick M. O'Malley (oma...@convex.com) wrote: >: A guy I play with has been fine-tuning this combination for weeks now, but >: the same rules question comes up every time he uses it. Does anyone know >: of a ruling that applies to this situation? The net opinion is that Fame is a monstrosity and should be banned or drastically changed. There are two proposed changes to Fame (check LSJ's house rules list), both of which fix this particular problem. Even Wizards (normally slow to recognize problem cards in both their games) has now restricted Fame to 1 in tournaments. >: Bring out Merill Molitor (Tremere, can change 1 damage from aggravated to >: normal each combat), and put Vast Wealth and a couple Fames on him. Play >: The Chantry. Use Vast Wealth to equip Talbot's Chainsaw on Merill. >: During untap, Merill does 3 damage to himself, ultimately putting him >: in torpor. Prey takes 6 damage from Fame when this happens. >Fame has been ruled as non-cumulative... They reversed it back and it's currently cumulative. >: Here's the loop: Merill goes to torpor from the TC during untap, with Fame >: doing 6 damage to his prey. During the master phase, he comes out of torpor >: via the Chantry. This cycle repeats until prey is ousted. >Just hope that noone goes in a diablerizes him before your MAster phase... He's only in torpor from his controller's untap to his controller's minion phase. There's no opportunity to diablerize. >: Question: can Merill perform an action after he comes out of torpor? He >: is untapped, and although he has no blood the TC card says that if the >: bearer is ready and untapped, it can attack any minion as a D action. >: This situation seems to be an instance of the Golden Rule for Cards, but >: some of us aren't sure that the TC wording is meant to allow the bearer >: to perform an action with zero blood. A TC holder with no blood may take no action other than hunt (rules) and cannot hunt (card), so he just sits there. Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com)

Patrick M. O'Malley

A guy I play with has been fine-tuning this combination for weeks now, but the same rules question comes up every time he uses it. Does anyone know of a ruling that applies to this situation? Bring out Merill Molitor (Tremere, can change 1 damage from aggravated to normal each combat), and put Vast Wealth and a couple Fames on him. Play The Chantry. Use Vast Wealth to equip Talbot's Chainsaw on Merill. During untap, Merill does 3 damage to himself, ultimately putting him in torpor. Prey takes 6 damage from Fame when this happens. Here's the loop: Merill goes to torpor from the TC during untap, with Fame doing 6 damage to his prey. During the master phase, he comes out of torpor via the Chantry. This cycle repeats until prey is ousted. Question: can Merill perform an action after he comes out of torpor? He is untapped, and although he has no blood the TC card says that if the bearer is ready and untapped, it can attack any minion as a D action. This situation seems to be an instance of the Golden Rule for Cards, but some of us aren't sure that the TC wording is meant to allow the bearer to perform an action with zero blood. (Why, you may ask, did the other players let this situation arise in the first place? Well, two players were playing Malkavians, I was playing Brujah (with no way to burn vampires in combat), and the only deck that could have burned the Tremeres (Gangrels) was sitting opposite him at the beginning of the game. I ended up winning one game by torporing and diablerizing all the Tremeres, but Merill won the other game when he got 3 Fames on him and blew through 3 players in 3 turns with the torpor/Fame/Chantry trick.) Pat oma...@convex.com

Charles Richard Robb

Patrick M. O'Malley (oma...@convex.com) wrote: : A guy I play with has been fine-tuning this combination for weeks now, but : the same rules question comes up every time he uses it. Does anyone know : of a ruling that applies to this situation? : Bring out Merill Molitor (Tremere, can change 1 damage from aggravated to : normal each combat), and put Vast Wealth and a couple Fames on him. Play : The Chantry. Use Vast Wealth to equip Talbot's Chainsaw on Merill. : During untap, Merill does 3 damage to himself, ultimately putting him : in torpor. Prey takes 6 damage from Fame when this happens. Fame has been ruled as non-cumulative... : Here's the loop: Merill goes to torpor from the TC during untap, with Fame : doing 6 damage to his prey. During the master phase, he comes out of torpor : via the Chantry. This cycle repeats until prey is ousted. Just hope that noone goes in a diablerizes him before your MAster phase... : Question: can Merill perform an action after he comes out of torpor? He : is untapped, and although he has no blood the TC card says that if the : bearer is ready and untapped, it can attack any minion as a D action. : This situation seems to be an instance of the Golden Rule for Cards, but : some of us aren't sure that the TC wording is meant to allow the bearer : to perform an action with zero blood. As long as he has blood, he can act. The thing to do is use a lesser vamp like a 2 cap. one. : (Why, you may ask, did the other players let this situation arise in the : first place? Well, two players were playing Malkavians, I was playing : Brujah (with no way to burn vampires in combat), and the only deck that could : have burned the Tremeres (Gangrels) was sitting opposite him at the beginning : of the game. I ended up winning one game by torporing and diablerizing all : the Tremeres, but Merill won the other game when he got 3 Fames on him and : blew through 3 players in 3 turns with the torpor/Fame/Chantry trick.) Who cares about burning vamps. Just put them all in torpor and then intercept their hunt or their coming out of torpor. If they are blocked coming out, you can burn them. If you block the hunt, they go back again.... Smashing Tremeres has been easy for me with my Brujah/ Toreador deck. I can easily put a 7 cap. vamp into torpor by round 3. Also use Arson, Bomb, or Unnatural Disaster to eliminate that Chantry...

James R. McClure Jr.

oma...@convex.com (Patrick M. O'Malley) wrote: > Question: can Merill perform an action after he comes out of torpor? He > is untapped, and although he has no blood the TC card says that if the > bearer is ready and untapped, it can attack any minion as a D action. > This situation seems to be an instance of the Golden Rule for Cards, but > some of us aren't sure that the TC wording is meant to allow the bearer > to perform an action with zero blood. Peace Pat, Officially, a minion which is empty (zero blood) and is wielding TC may NOT perform any actions, even if ready and untapped. Nil carborundum illigitimi, James R. McClure Jr. The OS/2 Apostle <insert disclaimer here>

Patrick M. O'Malley

In <3m26t0$3...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> curt...@aol.com (CurtAdams) writes: >>: Question: can Merill perform an action after he comes out of torpor? >He >>: is untapped, and although he has no blood the TC card says that if the >>: bearer is ready and untapped, it can attack any minion as a D action. >>: This situation seems to be an instance of the Golden Rule for Cards, >but >>: some of us aren't sure that the TC wording is meant to allow the bearer >>: to perform an action with zero blood. >A TC holder with no blood may take no action other than hunt (rules) and >cannot hunt (card), so he just sits there. But the TC card says he *can* attack a minion with the chainsaw if he is ready and untapped; it doesn't say he has to have blood on him. Isn't this a case of the Golden Rule for Cards, where the card text overrides the normal rule requiring him to hunt? Pat

Joseph Cochran

In article <3mbggp$m...@zeppelin.convex.com>, Patrick M. O'Malley <oma...@convex.com> wrote: >>A TC holder with no blood may take no action other than hunt (rules) and >>cannot hunt (card), so he just sits there. > >But the TC card says he *can* attack a minion with the chainsaw if he is >ready and untapped; it doesn't say he has to have blood on him. Isn't this >a case of the Golden Rule for Cards, where the card text overrides the >normal rule requiring him to hunt? This is one of the Design Team rulings that most of us agree with: a vampire equipped with TC who is empty (no blood) can take no actions, becasue the only action available is forbidden to him. | If you've got a hot lead on a new | *--Joe--* | PC game, call the announce line at | js...@vt.edu | ** csi...@discus.ise.vt.edu ** | +-------------------------------------+---------------------------------- "Carnivores, oy!" -- Timon, TLK

L. Scott Johnson

oma...@convex.com (Patrick M. O'Malley) writes: >In <3m26t0$3...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> curt...@aol.com (CurtAdams) writes: >>>: Question: can Merill perform an action after he comes out of torpor? >>He >>>: is untapped, and although he has no blood the TC card says that if the >>>: bearer is ready and untapped, it can attack any minion as a D action. >>>: This situation seems to be an instance of the Golden Rule for Cards, >>but >>>: some of us aren't sure that the TC wording is meant to allow the bearer >>>: to perform an action with zero blood. >>A TC holder with no blood may take no action other than hunt (rules) and >>cannot hunt (card), so he just sits there. >But the TC card says he *can* attack a minion with the chainsaw if he is >ready and untapped; it doesn't say he has to have blood on him. Isn't this >a case of the Golden Rule for Cards, where the card text overrides the >normal rule requiring him to hunt? No. It gives him an added action to choose from. Like AoR saying he (as one of the "any minions") could burn the army as a (D) action. It does not relieve him of his obligation to hunt if he has no blood. (Similarily, and empty vampire could not attempt to burn the AoR, since he would have to hunt). It (Talbot's C-saw) does, however prevent him from hunting (card text). So: he must hunt and cannot. He does nothing. (official answer from Tom, BTW).

CurtAdams

oma...@convex.com (Patrick M. O'Malley) writes: >>A Talbot's Chainsaw holder with no blood may take no action other than hunt >>(rules) and cannot hunt (card), so he just sits there. >But the TC card says he *can* attack a minion with the chainsaw if he is >ready and untapped; it doesn't say he has to have blood on him. Isn't this >a case of the Golden Rule for Cards, where the card text overrides the >normal rule requiring him to hunt? The card doesn't say he can take the action; it says he does take the action. Your position is tenable (does on the card overriding cannot in the rules), but the official ruling is that it doesn't (the card doesn't specify that this action overrides the restrictions on actions - e.g., bearer can't go off, if ready, in another's turn). Six of one, half dozen of the other, we go with the official rule. Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com)

Intimate apperal

On 10 Apr 1995, Joseph Cochran wrote: > This is one of the Design Team rulings that most of us agree > with: a vampire equipped with TC who is empty (no blood) can take no > actions, becasue the only action available is forbidden to him. > Simple fix for this - blood doll -> give him blood in torpor, bring him out, and hack n' slash :-) -tony Prince of Iowa City