Slaughtering the Herd

I know I saw a discussion of this pass a short while back, but I missed the resolution (if any) that was posted...is it supposed to be Dominate or Potence? Just looking to see if an answer was given.... -- "Everybody's playin' the game, but nobody's rules are the same" - Nobody's Side

Allison Flynn <st...@wizvax.wizvax.net> wrote in article <56aqep$b...@news.wizvax.net>... > I know I saw a discussion of this pass a short while back, but I missed > the resolution (if any) that was posted...is it supposed to be Dominate > or Potence? Just looking to see if an answer was given.... Unfortunitly, due to the absence of any representation from WotC, we have yet to get a ruling on which it actually is. At this point the majority believe it to be a Dominate card. Of course the majority may have been wrong before... -- Steve Bucy I'd be better off undead... "Hmmm. I notice the number of conditional phrases in there... _seems_ to indicate a weakness, _may_ be vulnerable in theory." - G'Kar

st...@wizvax.wizvax.net (Allison Flynn) writes: >I know I saw a discussion of this pass a short while back, but I missed >the resolution (if any) that was posted...is it supposed to be Dominate >or Potence? Just looking to see if an answer was given.... The mock-up (playtest) card had only dominate symbols, so you can expect errata/rulings to follow to make it a dominate card. (Also, the "official" list of cards on WotC's page lists it as a dominate card). Of course, getting the official errata/ruling will have to wait until we get an official presense on this group... -- L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | Experience is something you http://www.math.sc.edu/cgi-bin/sjohnson/home | get just after you need it. Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger. |