4 players table with the following sense of bleeding: A -> B -> C -> D
Player A is bleeding player B with one of their vampires.
All players decline to block.
Player B plays Deflection sending the bleed to player C.
Player C plays Direct Intervention on Player B's Deflection.
Player A plays Conditioning superior.
Player D wants to play Eagle's Sight to block player A's bleed
Choose the correct option:
1) Player D can play Eagle's Sight as a new block window is opened after Conditioning was played
2) Player D can play Eagle's Sight as playing the Deflection opened a new block window
3) Player D can't play Eagle's Sight as cancelling the Deflection doesn't open a new block window (target of the bleed has not changed) and Deflection can only be played after blocks(all) are declined. CORRECT
Relevant cardtext:
Name: Deflection
Cardtype: Reaction
Cost: 1 blood
Discipline: Dominate
Only usable if a minion is bleeding you, after blocks are declined.
[dom] Lock this reacting vampire. Change the target of the bleed to another Methuselah other than the acting minion's controller (that Methuselah can attempt to block).
[DOM] As above, but do not lock this vampire.
Name: Direct Intervention
Cardtype: Master
Cost: 1 pool
Out-of-turn.
Cancel a minion card as it is played, and its cost is not paid. (If it was an action card, the acting minion does not lock. If it was a strike card, the minion chooses another strike.)
Name: Eagle's Sight
Cardtype: Reaction
Discipline: Auspex
[aus] +1 intercept.
[AUS] This vampire attempts to block the current action, ignoring the normal prey, predator or target restrictions for blocking actions.
Name: Conditioning
Cardtype: Action Modifier
Cost: 1 blood
Discipline: Dominate
Only usable during a bleed action.
[dom] +2 bleed (limited).
[DOM] +3 bleed (limited).
> beslin wrote:
> after player A declare total bleed,can he play Conditioning superior?
>
"declaring total bleed" isn't something defined by the rule. If A passes the impulse, A cannot play Conditioning.
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
This scenario:
4 players table with the following sense of bleeding: A -> B -> C -> D
Player A is bleeding player B with one of their vampires.
All players decline to block.
---so impulse back to A,A dint play anything,just anounce total bleed( with Arika for 3 example)
Player B plays Deflection sending the bleed to player C.
Player C plays Direct Intervention on Player B's Deflection.
if A have impulse there to increase bleed?
Player A plays Conditioning superior.
> beslin wrote:
> This scenario:
>
> 4 players table with the following sense of bleeding: A -> B -> C -> D
>
> Player A is bleeding player B with one of their vampires.
> All players decline to block.
> ---so impulse back to A,A dint play anything,just anounce total bleed( with Arika for 3 example)
> Player B plays Deflection sending the bleed to player C.
>
Technically, here the impulse to play any cancellation cards goes back to player A, who declines to do anything and the impulse goes to the other players, B, and then C.
> beslin wrote:
> Player C plays Direct Intervention on Player B's Deflection.
> if A have impulse there to increase bleed?
> Player A plays Conditioning superior.
>
Yes, after the DI, impulse goes back to player A who can play a card (Conditioning)
> acbishop wrote:
>
> > beslin wrote:
> > This scenario:
> >
> > 4 players table with the following sense of bleeding: A -> B -> C -> D
> >
> > Player A is bleeding player B with one of their vampires.
> > All players decline to block.
> > ---so impulse back to A,A dint play anything,just anounce total bleed( with Arika for 3 example)
> > Player B plays Deflection sending the bleed to player C.
> >
> Technically, here the impulse to play any cancellation cards goes back to player A, who declines to do anything and the impulse goes to the other players, B, and then C.
>
> > beslin wrote:
> > Player C plays Direct Intervention on Player B's Deflection.
> > if A have impulse there to increase bleed?
> > Player A plays Conditioning superior.
> >
> Yes, after the DI, impulse goes back to player A who can play a card (Conditioning)
>
Well,actually here then:
"Player C plays Direct Intervention on Player B's Deflection."
If B have another Deflection,he need to ask A,if A have something to play(increase bleed example),and then can play his 2nd Deflection.
Can all that be confirmed from Rule Director?
> beslin wrote:
>
> > acbishop wrote:
> >
> > > beslin wrote:
> > > This scenario:
> > >
> > > 4 players table with the following sense of bleeding: A -> B -> C -> D
> > >
> > > Player A is bleeding player B with one of their vampires.
> > > All players decline to block.
> > > ---so impulse back to A,A dint play anything,just anounce total bleed( with Arika for 3 example)
> > > Player B plays Deflection sending the bleed to player C.
> > >
> > >
> > Technically, here the impulse to play any cancellation cards goes back to player A, who declines to do anything and the impulse goes to the other players, B, and then C.
> >
> > > beslin wrote:
> > > Player C plays Direct Intervention on Player B's Deflection.
> > > if A have impulse there to increase bleed?
> > > Player A plays Conditioning superior.
> > >
> > >
> > Yes, after the DI, impulse goes back to player A who can play a card (Conditioning)
> >
> Well,actually here then:
> "Player C plays Direct Intervention on Player B's Deflection."
> If B have another Deflection,he need to ask A,if A have something to play(increase bleed example),and then can play his 2nd Deflection.
> Can all that be confirmed from Rule Director?
>
B cannot play another Deflection with the same minion but can play a Deflection with diferent minion when A gives him the impulse, so A can play Conditioning and B play then a Deflection with another minion or a different card to bounce the bleed