Not Unique Vampires league 2020- rules and report

League 2020 League starts on Sunday May 10th at 20h CET. Organized league games will be played during the next 6 Sundays and next 6 Fridays: May 10th, 15th, 17th, 22nd, 24th, 29th, 31st / June: 5th, 7th, 12th, 14th,19th. Each player is limited to 10 games but only 5 best games will be calculated in tabela. The final bonus for league is 0.25. The 5 best players will go to the finals. Seating in finals is random! 1st deck load in finals 5th seed,and top seed load deck last Multi deck system (you can play a different deck each game). Registration Tell one of the organizers that you want to play for this day, either on Lackey or contact us on social media. Connect to Lackey approximately 1 hour before the start time. Registrations are closed 15min prior start time. Organizers Igor Beslin () Lackey name: Beslin Igor Martin Weinmayer () Lackey name: angrynewb Rudolf Scholz Lackey name: The Bard Self-organized game are allowed so that players can play more than one game during the week, but the maximum number games in league is 10. Self-organized games are allowed until June 19nd. How to report self-organized games? The player who organizes the table needs to check that all players are registered before the online event . If some players are not registered, the organizer will need to include in the table report for each unregistered player: the full real name the lackey name the country The organizer can check which players are already registered here: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-player-overview?show=player-list Special rule: A contested vampire remains in play. Their controller must pay 1 pool to continue to contest them, or yield during the unlock phase, but can play with them normally (act, block, play cards, cast votes or ballots etc.). If this vampire has a title that is also contested, the vampire must pay 1 blood point to keep it, as usual. Announcement from BCP: www.blackchantry.com/2020/05/09/new-rule-test-contesting-crypt-cards. Special rule contested vampires(for now): if some unique vampire special afect whole table then efect is cumulative,because his special is unique,so example for Leandro paying pool is cumulative,Servius Mauris Pustala each player get +2X hand size..... Some word from rule director:

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report yesterday league start,10 players-2 tables-contest dint happen. 3 players 1st time play Lackey league. In table 1 of popular vampires we see Matashuntha+unnamed as toolbox deck played by Nosfi,and Lazverinus played by Alf,in game be much fight,much torpored and burned vampires,and game finished by time limit. In table 2 we see 3 star deck,but they die fast by stealt bleed deck kiasyd+lasombra. Sha ennu,Stanislava and Lutz be without defense. In results of this league i will include also frendly game reported playing with tested contested rules,so I want to ask everyone who test this rule even in frendly games,games with pasword with his frends sent me deck info,results,and if contest happen I need more impresions from players who play games where contest happen. In frendly game we see: Montano,Rachel,unnamed of star vampires. Frendly games be reported as playing by : games1,gamer2......they be included in tabela,but be ignored for final standings. players can read rule,BC anounce,league info here: www.vekn.net/forum/lackeyccg/78624-not-unique-vampires-league-2020-rules-and-report Tabela in hook is here: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 results in image: league games: frendly games:

Remember: we want data. We are especially interested in game reports including: Frequency: How many games had a vampire being contested / games played? The situation of the two (or more) players contesting (prey/predator? other?) For how long the vampires were contested. How did it end? How much blood was left on the vampire after the contest? Is the penalty balanced from their point of view? from the non-contesting players’ point of view? Are star decks appearing more often over time? (It can take time for the players to adjust to the new rule) This means that if there were not vampire contest on your table, we are still interested by your game data to find out the frequency of contest. Also, feel free to play any deck you want! Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

I'm worried that while this league will generate info towards frequenzy of contestation part, the other effects of having multiple same vampires running around table might not get enough data. Thus I have a request: Beslin Igor and co, could you after this one is over, please organize another league where it is purposefully set up so that contestation does occur. Say for a five player game draw a lot. Two of the players draw a single name from list of say 20 most commonly seen powerhouse star vampires (Unnamed, Lutz, Anson, Arika etc.) both having to play deck where the named vampire plays pivotal role. Other players can also play decks with vampires drawn from that lis are even encouraged to do so, but they can play whatever they want. To make this work: Start list needs to be agreed on and All player have to make before hand at least one deck for vampire named on the list. Maybe draw from TWDA if you don't have a deck for given name yourself

> Whisker wrote: > I'm worried that while this league will generate info towards frequenzy of contestation part, the other effects of having multiple same vampires running around table might not get enough data. > Thus I have a request: > Beslin Igor and co, could you after this one is over, please organize another league where it is purposefully set up so that contestation does occur. Say for a five player game draw a lot. Two of the players draw a single name from list of say 20 most commonly seen powerhouse star vampires (Unnamed, Lutz, Anson, Arika etc.) both having to play deck where the named vampire plays pivotal role. Other players can also play decks with vampires drawn from that lis are even encouraged to do so, but they can play whatever they want. > To make this work: Start list needs to be agreed on and > All player have to make before hand at least one deck for vampire named on the list. Maybe draw from TWDA if you don't have a deck for given name yourself > I thinked about that,but I think is not fair to I force people to play decks if they dont want. people can chose everthing to play. but I will see with BC after this league be finished if we need this idea in practice.

Also, we'd like to know how often it happens, not get biaised results by forcing players to contest vampires. Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report Yesterday is played 2 games with testing new contest rule. 1 league game and 1 frendly game,contest dint happen. In league we see: goratrix,stanislava and malgorzada with lord and mistres. in frendly game,Gabrin is played as star rules and BC anounce: www.vekn.net/forum/lackeyccg/78624-not-unique-vampires-league-2020-rules-and-report tabela,tables,deck statistic in Hook: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/event-summary/show-events/152-vtes-test-not-unique-vampires?fbclid=IwAR1Zazk0IaSsZxJWRPmgSeyRVW8Btrey99vW0AQwf55hpwlQUEeinh9K9xk new results: League frendly

> Ankha wrote: > Also, we'd like to know how often it happens, not get biaised results by forcing players to contest vampires. > It dont happen more ofter because of the contest rule, to get a non biaised result check tournment reports from before the rule. If you look at Igor report you will see that lots of decks are unique/vampire based instead of concept based, for example: Malgorzata Stanislava Gabrin Lazverinus Unnamed Matasuntha Sha-Enmu Lutz Montano Rachel Brandwyne Antonio D'erlette (nephandus/tupdog probably use it) I know that you randomly stumble with a deck that uses a uncommon crypt just sucks, but you cant use this to let the star decks run wild, remember that we already dont have Pentex anymore. If you take a look at decks prior Pentex nerf, every star deck have at least one way to avoid it Wash, Sudden, another Pentex for contest, etc... After the nerf this cards started to fade from those kind of decks and they become even more narrow. The risk/reward balance changed, less risk, same reward. Without the big impact of contest, the risk is decreased another time and the reward will be the same. You dont see contest happen often because people actively avoid it, its not just random chances. Someone contest a Pariah is bad luck LOW RISK/low reward, someone constest a Stanislava is expected HIGH RISK/high reward. The biggest problem is that when contest happens usually is with those big caps and its catastrophic because you lose more then 11 pool and a lot of turns. The new influence rule kinds of avoid it making it possible to influence to contest only if you want. My proposal is: Instead of change the Contest rules, changes the influence rules. Pay 1 pool to be able to move transfers ( up to your transfers ) from from one card in your uncontrolled region to another with the same age or younger (to avoid Govern the unaligned and other cards to be abusable) in your uncontrolled region (impossible with a Brainwash or similar in any of those 2 cards). That way if you happens to be in the same table and someone brings your vampire to the table, instead of influence back all the way at half transfers and then influence back at normal rate you can just influence "sideways" to open another vampire. Example 1: Round 1 - Player A Influence 2 in Arika Player B influence 4 in Arika Round 2 - Player A influence +4 ( total 6 in Arika ) Player B use Zillahs and bring arika to the game Round 3 - Player A instead of influence more in arika, pay 1 pool, influence "sideways" 4 transfers from Arika to Lucinde and influence more 4 in Lucinde. Round 4 - Player A move influence more 2 in Lucinde and influence 2 in arika to force a contest... Example 2 - Round 1 Player A uses Information highway and influence 3 in enkidu Player B Plays Zilah and influence 8 Round 2 Player A influence +6 in enkidu ( total 9 ) Player B brings Enkidu Round 3 Player A influence pay 1 pool, influence 6 "sideways" from enkidu to Karsh and influence more 4 to bring it to the game. The "transfers ratio" is just an idea of how to keeps it balanced instead of just move all counters but maybe you can remove the crypt card from the game to move all transfers from one card to another. That can help with the problem of contest without change the unique mechanic Archbishop of Itaocara Prince ID #510

What happens to the title contest of Hardestadt vs. Hardestadt and of Rafael de Corazon vs. Rafael de Corazon under this contestation rule? Will the first copy have to yield his title when he reaches his turn with the other copy still active? > Camarilla Ventrue Inner Circle: Any vampire contesting Hardestadt's title must yield during their unlock phase. +1 bleed. +2 strength. > > Camarilla Toreador Inner Circle: Any vampire contesting Rafael's title must yield during their unlock phase. > National Coordinator Germany nc [dot] germany [at] magenta [dot] de

The proposed rule change that is currently playtested will open up many a can of worms just like Hakuron showed above. These would be better left unopened! Finnish Politics!

> Hakuron wrote: > What happens to the title contest of Hardestadt vs. Hardestadt? > Table throwing.

I think the example Hakuron posted should be relatively easy to handle: the next player controlling a copy of the contested Inner Circle that starts their unlock phase must yield the contest of the title. Assuming that there are only 2 copies of the respective vampire in play, when the 2nd reaches their unlock phase, the contest is ended. Furthermore, Hardestadt's special does not apply to himself in the case of contest, and after a copy of Hardestadt has yielded the title, that copy isn't contesting anymore, so that copys special also doesn't apply anymore. But there is another weird example: Crusade: Aragon and two Sabbat Lucitas in play. Ideas, anyone? Crusade: Aragon Requires a Sabbat vampire. Title. If this referendum passes, put this card on the acting vampire to represent the unique Sabbat title of Archbishop of Aragon. If Lucita is in play and is Sabbat, put this card on her instead. Prince of Bonn, Germany

> Yomyael wrote: > But there is another weird example: Crusade: Aragon and two Sabbat Lucitas in play. Ideas, anyone? > > Crusade: Aragon > > Requires a Sabbat vampire. Title. > If this referendum passes, put this card on the acting vampire to represent the unique Sabbat title of Archbishop of Aragon. If Lucita is in play and is Sabbat, put this card on her instead. > Start with the acting Methuselah and move clockwise. The first Lucita encountered gains the title.

Ankha? > Hakuron wrote: > What happens to the title contest of Hardestadt vs. Hardestadt and of Rafael de Corazon vs. Rafael de Corazon under this contestation rule? > Will the first copy have to yield his title when he reaches his turn with the other copy still active? > > > Camarilla Ventrue Inner Circle: Any vampire contesting Hardestadt's title must yield during their unlock phase. +1 bleed. +2 strength. > > > > Camarilla Toreador Inner Circle: Any vampire contesting Rafael's title must yield during their unlock phase. > > > Yomyael wrote: > > But there is another weird example: Crusade: Aragon and two Sabbat Lucitas in play. Ideas, anyone? > > Crusade: Aragon > > Requires a Sabbat vampire. Title. > If this referendum passes, put this card on the acting vampire to represent the unique Sabbat title of Archbishop of Aragon. If Lucita is in play and is Sabbat, put this card on her instead. >

This one is very tricky because you can't put the card on two different copies; however, since the card is a placeholder for the title, let's say it is contested (out of play) and both Lucita contest the title. Whatever copy wins the contest will receive the card to represent that title. Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

> Yomyael wrote: > I think the example Hakuron posted should be relatively easy to handle: the next player controlling a copy of the contested Inner Circle that starts their unlock phase must yield the contest of the title. Assuming that there are only 2 copies of the respective vampire in play, when the 2nd reaches their unlock phase, the contest is ended. > Correct. Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report 2 league and one frendly games played. 10 players play in league,first time rule director Vincent play online league. In 2 tables we see only 2 Big cap vampires: Mimir(star) and Kamiri (no star),other player chose mid or small cap. both games finished fast,in table 1 Gotcha take 4VP with weenie vote deck,and theBard in table 2 with Giovany bleed take 5VP. Frendly game is played with 4 star vampires: Cybele,Gabrin,Saulot,Anson,GW for Cybele all details in Hook : www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/event-summary/show-events/152-vtes-test-not-unique-vampires?fbclid=IwAR2JF_iEjwP2I3oaSHAVegeKLReJTj5Ie3v7iFeHu2UlhodO-rqodHlZoRQ results in images: League frendly

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report 16 players fight on 4 tables. 2 GW,one time out table. No contest happen. We see 6 star decks,Only Anson with gun take GW,Lutz Mimir Unnamed Stanislava no luck,Nana tie table 2/2 vs weenie bleed grenade. 25 player play in league after 3rd organized games. Complete rule and tabela statistic league with BC anounce: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/event-summary/show-events/152-vtes-test-not-unique-vampires?fbclid=IwAR0cFxOYh9Tx67wHQbSpHrCerJ9q8x1ULXoK9wn06BWRNyb3ffKdR7AfhP0 Tables:

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES During last weekend one frendly game is played with test new BC contest rule,there predator/prey contest Lydia(True Brujah vampire). I give complete report one of players from table with images

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report 4th round-10 players(9 europe,1 brazil),2 games,2 champions: Europe champion Otso Saariluoma and Lackey world champion Milutin Melka! In both games we see Cybele deck as big star deck,but both Cybele take 0 VP. Table 1 very strange,gotcha oust all 5 players with votes,but 2 times kill wrong prey and him take "only" 3 VP. Table 2 finished By withdraw for Reaper who make deal with Dada,withdraw for Reaper give him GW. There is also reported 1 frendly game with new contest rules. Rules and tabela: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/event-summary/show-events/152-vtes-test-not-unique-vampires?fbclid=IwAR1mPEe8y-l23HmiM_FAIXwAjin_BZP0I4nZsEAGQipgPfr6W1atvDFXqw0 results:

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report Round 5-15 players-3 games,and finaly contest: Baba Yaga is contested on table 3. predator and prey fight each other Baba Yaga,and contest is finished by burning predator Baba Yaga. burned Baba Yaga is not star in deck,there in crypt are vampires as: Enkidu,Matashuntha,Fakir al Sidi. Baba Yaga who survive until end is star vampire. game is finished by time limit. I wait more report and impresions players in this table: Eduardo Simões Thibaud Passeratdlc Nikolaj Wendt Milutin Melka Balázs Pásztor Table 1 Legionares take GW and table 2 Giovani bleed. 1 self organize game played in sunday won Bobotz with Lasombra bleed 5VP Tabela in hook: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 Results in images:

Another good question raised by Ossian on Discord: What if a Spell of Life brings out an ally contesting a vampire already in play ? Is the ally contested and kept out of play while the vampire is kept into play contested ? This does seem logical but a bit unfair Spell of Life +1 stealth action. Put this card in play. Only one Spell of Life may be played each turn. You may burn five Spells of Life to put up to five vampires from your uncontrolled region in play. Each represents a unique mummy ally with life equal to capacity, 1 bleed and 2 strength who can enter combat with a minion as a Ⓓ action.

Another great example why the contesting rule, if changed, should NOT be changed in a manner that let several unique vampires be present at the table! So many complications involving it, so that can of worms should best be kept shut. Finnish Politics!

> Lönkka wrote: > Another great example why the contesting rule, if changed, should NOT be changed in a manner that let several unique vampires be present at the table! > > So many complications involving it, so that can of worms should best be kept shut. > Message understood. But to me it looks like that the current contestation rule test is nevertheless helpful: It helps us to understand better why exactly the rulebook version of this rule is "good" and/or "bad". National Coordinator Germany nc [dot] germany [at] magenta [dot] de

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report round 6. 10 players. 2 games. 2 GW In 2 games we can see 8 star deck. in both tables be Enkidu and Goratrix deck-so 4 super star deck but only 1VP,GW take Bleds deck Cybele and Unnamed. We have one self organize game played in monday where vote deck Dmitra+Ishtary won. Results in images:

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report round 7. 15 players. 3 games. 3 GW Table 1 won Carna tolbox vs Leandro,unnamed and Saulot. Table 2 won lackey world champion deck stickman toolbox vs Enkidu. table 3 won Ravnos Laibon vote after playing Week of Nightmares. In this table Nana be contested,but 0 turns,because when Cicero put NaNa in play,Remi be ousted before get chance to pay contest. Tabela: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 Tables :

Would like to ask Vincent for a clarification regarding "Spell of Life" under the currently tested vampire contestation rule: Usually a vampire in play would be contested by the mummy brought into play via Spell of Life. Would now both vampire and mummy be able to "play their game"? > The mummies put into play are unique by card name. The name is "in play" for anything that cares. They will contest unique minions of the same name, vampire or allies. If one is Nefertiti, then Aabbt Kindred will be able to take directed actions. [LSJ 20070928‑2] [LSJ 20071001‑2] > > Name: Spell of Life > Cardtype: Action > Clan: Follower of Set > +1 stealth action. > Put this card in play. Only one Spell of Life may be played each turn. You may burn five Spells of Life to put up to five vampires from your uncontrolled region in play. Each represents a unique mummy ally with life equal to capacity, 1 bleed and 2 strength who can enter combat with a minion as a action. > National Coordinator Germany nc [dot] germany [at] magenta [dot] de

> Hakuron wrote: > Would like to ask Vincent for a clarification regarding "Spell of Life" under the currently tested vampire contestation rule: > Usually a vampire in play would be contested by the mummy brought into play via Spell of Life. Would now both vampire and mummy be able to "play their game"? > They would, indeed. Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020 continue in friday in 20:00h CET. There will be Black Chantry Productions sponsored prizes for this league! Winner and finalists will be awarded VTES sleeves and playmats, and all participants in the league will receive a Charisma promo card. Prizes will be handed out at larger physical events when safe.

> Ankha wrote: > > > Hakuron wrote: > > Usually a vampire in play would be contested by the mummy brought into play via Spell of Life. Would now both vampire and mummy be able to "play their game"? > > > They would, indeed. > So allies would follow the same contesting rule ? Or just allies that are "based" on vampire cards ? Or is it just a specific case for Spell of Life ?

> lip wrote: > [ > So allies would follow the same contesting rule ? Or just allies that are "based" on vampire cards ? Or is it just a specific case for Spell of Life ? > > If more than one unique card with the same name is brought into play, that means control of the card is being contested. > So according to rulebook, rules count unique cards with the same name. The mummies are unique and have same name as the vampire, so they would contest, as far as I can see. Smoking craters tell no tales. —Tex talks Battletech

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-report 8.round,12 players in 3 tables. 3 GW,every GW with 3 VP. Very fast is finished table 2,where won Anson block. Stanislava bleed won table 2. Last finished table with much combats in table is table 3 where won Guillaume Giovani with 9 locations. tabela in Hook: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 results: one self organize game:

> Bloodartist wrote: > > > lip wrote: > > [ > > So allies would follow the same contesting rule ? Or just allies that are "based" on vampire cards ? Or is it just a specific case for Spell of Life ? > > > > If more than one unique card with the same name is brought into play, that means control of the card is being contested. > > > So according to rulebook, rules count unique cards with the same name. The mummies are unique and have same name as the vampire, so they would contest, as far as I can see. > Well, sure, but I would have expected them to contest as allies, meaning they would be out of play and not able to act. Do they contest as vampires, staying in play, because they are contesting a vampire ? Or does this extend to all allies and we can now have two Carlton in play ? I'm confused.

> lip wrote: > I'm confused. > If the contesting rule being playtested is approved you won't be the only one. Allowing several Unique minions to exist on the game at the same time opens up a huge can of worms which would be better left unopened. Notable and better alternatives have been proposed. If the rule needs to be changed it would be much wiser to use them since they do not allow multiple Unique minions to co-exist. Finnish Politics!

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-round 9 14 players,3 tables,2GW,2 time out only table with 4 players finished fast,both table 5 finished by time out. Both GW get star deck: Nergal and Ghede,table 3 dont have one star vampire in deck,but Nosfi play Mata+unnamed. we have 41 player in league. tabela : www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 results:

> lip wrote: > Well, sure, but I would have expected them to contest as allies, meaning they would be out of play and not able to act. Do they contest as vampires, staying in play, because they are contesting a vampire ? Or does this extend to all allies and we can now have two Carlton in play ? I'm confused. > Mummies aren't vampires, so I guess they don't stay in play? It doesn't make a difference whether they are out of the game or not, since they still contest. (Same as the old vampire contest rule) Difference is that vampires would be able to act while contesting whereas allies wont. I don't think this is terribly complicated. I did have to double check the rulebook about contesting. Seems like the only things that matter are the cards name and its uniqueness. Whether the card (with the same name) is an ally or vampire or anything else doesn't really matter. They still contest. Smoking craters tell no tales. —Tex talks Battletech

> lip wrote: > > > Ankha wrote: > > > > > Hakuron wrote: > > > Usually a vampire in play would be contested by the mummy brought into play via Spell of Life. Would now both vampire and mummy be able to "play their game"? > > > > > They would, indeed. > > > So allies would follow the same contesting rule ? Or just allies that are "based" on vampire cards ? Or is it just a specific case for Spell of Life ? > Sorry: vampires can be used, allies are out of play (contested). Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

Somewhat confusing. Yet again, one more reason not to redo contesting the way it is being playtested ATM. Finnish Politics!

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-round 10 15 players-3 tables - 1GW 4 players 1st time play league. Only 5 star deck played of 15,unnamed play 2 times and one unnamed take GW. 1 self organize games is played in wendesday,GW for Lasombra/Kiasyd bleed deck Today in 20:30 league continue,last round be played next friday. tabela and rules : www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 results:

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-round 11 Finaly we gets record in number players in one round-23 players. 4 games start in same time,and one table start lately for people who cannot atend in 20:30,thanks Eduardo on organizing table 5. 23 players-23 decks,only 2 star vampires deck-Nana and Lutz. Nana deck won his table,but no luck for Lutz. We have 49 players in league,next friday we play last round and then we determine date for finals. People who played 10 games cannot play more games in this league(except finals). When finals be determined will be opened register for judge and stream finals. tabela league: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 We have one contest in table 1,but is yield in first unlock phase. what happen? Krle with Nana deck play Tension,and LsuP play TupDog deck. LsuP ask to Krle burn Tension,but after Krle refused to burn Tension,TupDog rush Nana,sent torpor and Graverobing she. But Krle prepare new Nana and rush LsuP Nana,after Nana sent to torpor Krle put new Nana in play,but Lsup yield contest in next unlock. LsuP be presured with 419 and Form of Coruption back and cannot handle contest. Lsup be first ousted,and Hobbesgoblin took 2nd VP,then Krle took VP and in 1vs1 Krle oust Hobbesgoblin and Nana deck won. Table 2 is only table where no GW and is finished by time limit,only one player is ousted in table by-selfoust. Table 3 won Vote deck. Table 4 Giovani with Shambling Hordes take with 4 VP. Table 5 won Samedi with his allyes bleed deck. Results:

Not Unique Vampires league 2020-self organize games report 2 games played yesterday,1GW and another table time limit 0,5 for every player. We have 50 players in league now. I beleive tomorow will be played self organize games too. Can play players only with less than 10 games in league. Friday is last day for qualifications,and then we determine 5 finalist and maybe date for finals. Also will be open register for judge and stream finals. Tabela league: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 results:

Not Unique Vampires league 2020-today is last 12th round. games start in 20:30 CEST. 52 players play in league until now. Complete league info,tabela,tables,deck statistic is there: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/event-summary/152-vtes-event-not-unique-vampires?fbclid=IwAR2cSEyJe6rh8pP1qqFNRGMZmcryqckVlnSQ39lgoBRgt3LRxVW6b95oFSQ Note: only 5 best games is calculated in tournament tabela as is written in the tabela on the hook page, my apologies to all players who did not know about this rule. Today I hear how some people dint know this rule. Yesterday is played 2 self organize games:

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020-round 12 Yesterday is played last round of league,9 players and in both tables we see GW,Cybele Bleed and Tariq Combat won tables with 3 VP. We know 5 finalist,still need to determine finals date,I will inform about that. Tabela is here: www.vtes-hook.com/vtes/show-event-informations?show=event&liga=00058 Finalists and results:

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020 FINALS BE PLAYED IN MONDAY 20:30 CEST In this topic I want to open register for judge and if someone interested to stream finals and to represent finalist. We have special rule in league: A contested vampire remains in play. Their controller must pay 1 pool to continue to contest them, or yield during the unlock phase, but can play with them normally (act, block, play cards, cast votes or ballots etc.). If this vampire has a title that is also contested, the vampire must pay 1 blood point to keep it, as usual. So if someone want to be judge in finals inform me here in topic or in private mesage,same if someone can stream finals,make register here or in private mesage. If be more judges and stream people we must to chose one of them. Finalist (with counting 5 best games in league): Marius Iscru "Reaper", France-Top seed 4GW 10,5VP Marius play 9 finals in online competions and 2 time won. Milutin Melka 'MM11',Serbia-2ns seed 3GW 14,5VP Milutin is Lackey World Champion 2019 and him play 2 finals in online competions. Nikica Novakovic 'ResurrectioN', Serbia 3GW 13,5VP Nikica play 1st finals in online competions. Rudolf Scholz 'TheBard', Germany 2GW 13,5VP Rudolf play 4 finals in online competions and won 3 times. Jennifer Fuss "Teylen"Germany 2GW 11,5VP Jennifer play 1st finals in online competions.

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020 FINALS START IN 20:30 CET FINALS BE STREAM IN LINK: www.twitch.tv/codex_of_the_damned

Since Igor went to sleep I guess, let it be said that winner was Marius Iscru (Reaper) with his harbinger legionnaire deck by ousting Nikica Novakovic (Resurrection) during the last few minutes Reaper 3 VP +GW Resurrection 2VP Well played! I doubted reapers victory up until the last turn. Smoking craters tell no tales. —Tex talks Battletech

Doesn't Reaper get an additional VP for being last man standing ?

> lip wrote: > Doesn't Reaper get an additional VP for being last man standing ? > Indeed the result is: Reaper 3 VP + GW Resurrection 2 VP National Coordinator Germany nc [dot] germany [at] magenta [dot] de

Thanks for the correction, I was misled by some peoples talk during the finals. I forgot it was actually 3v2 and not a victory by seeding as someone said. Smoking craters tell no tales. —Tex talks Battletech

NOT UNIQUE VAMPIRES LEAGUE 2020 Marius Iscru "Reaper", France is Winner Congratulations on Winning thanks all for playing, Kazpex for judging,Phoenix for stream,and Teylen for recording finals Report in images: cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463448378521550859/724983021974978620/k1.png cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463448378521550859/724983128111841330/k2.png cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463448378521550859/724983812156555364/k21.png cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463448378521550859/724983982994751528/k4.png cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463448378521550859/724984071364542464/k3.png cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463448378521550859/724984467755761664/k7.png cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463448378521550859/724984578057568266/k9.png

FINALS GAME REPORT Seating Marcus "Reaper" (Emerald Legion) -> Milutin "MM11" (True Power) -> Nikica "ResurrectioN" (Mistress & Malgorzata) -> Jennifer "Teylen" (Shambling Hordes) -> Rudolf "TheBard" (Rebekka Powerbleed) Game Report Teylen negotiates with ResurrectioN to avoid some heavy bleed and rush forward, quickly sending one of TheBard's minion to torpor, helped by Reaper's Dark Influences to counter TheBard's Majesty . TheBard uses Entrancement to steal Ossian then a Shambling Hordes from Teylen in retaliation, leaving her open. Teylen is ousted first after ResurrectioN uses Mistress Fanchon 's ability to fetch an Ancilla Empowerment . Reaper manages to get an Emerald Legionnaire out, but it is quickly dispatched by MM11's Outside the Hourglass . TheBard fails to apply much pressure on Reaper as he carefully builds up and keeps minions unlocked. ResurrectioN fetches an Anarchist Uprising and moves for the kill: he bleeds for 3 and ousts TheBard, who has no Telepathic Misdirection remaining. With 1:20 remaining, the game is down to three players with ResurrectioN at two VPs. Reaper puts pressure on the table to get things moving faster throughout the second part of the game. MM11 bleeds for 1 most of the game, using many tricks to unlock and avoid combat. Reaper juggles with Villein and Liquidation to stay alive, and finally manages to keep a Legionnaire in play and use its ability. Combined with Babalawo 's ability, he has 5 of them in play in the next turn. MM11 manages to block ResurrectioN's Reins of Power , but succumbs to the growing pressure of the Legion. The end of the game is tense, and Reaper manages to build up his Legion until 7 Legionnaire are in play. He finally ousts ResurrectioN after going through his 20 remaining pool, with only 3 minutes remaining on the timer.