rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Card Rulings: Wave of Lethargy

6 messages from 5 participants · 07 April 2020 – 06 November 2024 · vekn.net/forum
the topic on the V:EKN forum

lip

The "Cards Rulings" section indicate, for Wave of Lethargy: Only the cost of playing the card is increased - if the card provides multiple maneuvers and presses, it is only increased by one. Maneuvers from other sources (in play) do not cost extra. [LSJ 20011023]. It has been ruled so multiple times (e.g. [LSJ 20060725] ). However, the card text seems to have changed since (it used to read "Maneuvers and presses cost the opposing vampire an additional blood to play" before 2007) : Wave of Lethargy [Combat][1B] [qui] Only usable before range is determined. Maneuvers and presses cost the opposing vampire an additional blood this round. A vampire may play only one Wave of Lethargy each round of combat. [QUI] As above, and strike cards cost the opposing vampire an additional blood this round. Does the ruling still stand ? If not, is there a more recent ruling or an official card text change list ?

kschaefer

It appears that the ruling is no longer appropriate since "to play" was removed from the text on the official list around the time of Lords of the Night. As it reads now, maneuvering with a .44 would cost 1 blood. With DTC physical printing down and archive.org not having a snapshot after the Assamite/Quietus cards were added, it's hard to know what text the current cards have. It would be good to get Ankha to weigh in here and possibly update the rulings page.

Ankha

Yes, the card text was changed a long time ago by LSJ and is the same as today: Name: Wave of Lethargy Cardtype: Combat Cost: 1 blood Discipline: Quietus [qui] Only usable before range is determined. Maneuvers and presses cost the opposing vampire an additional blood this round. A vampire may play only one Wave of Lethargy each round of combat. [QUI] As above, and strike cards cost the opposing vampire an additional blood this round. I'll remove the old ruling. Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

beslin igor

after discusion on discord,I want to ask some thing to rule of this card be clear. so new text is: Wave of Lethargy Only usable before range is determined. A vampire can play only one Wave of Lethargy each round. q Cards providing maneuvers and/or presses cost the opposing vampire 1 additional blood to play this round. Q As above, and strike cards cost the opposing vampire 1 additional blood to play this round. so for example,if card works on this way: so example combat card played during man/press step,giving you man/press,cost +1 blood? how much there cost Thrown Gate ( Strike: 1R damage, with an optional maneuver.)? so give you both man+strike? card giving man+press how works? example: Resist Earth's Grasp Press, or maneuver with 1 optional press.

Ankha

Please ALWAYS quote cardtext from www.vekn.net/images/stories/downloads/cardlist.txt, not from another source. Name: Wave of Lethargy [FN:R2, POD:DTC] Cardtype: Combat Cost: 1 blood Discipline: Quietus Only usable before range is determined. A vampire can play only one Wave of Lethargy each round. [qui] Cards providing maneuvers and/or presses cost the opposing vampire 1 additional blood to play this round. [QUI] As above, and strike cards cost the opposing vampire 1 additional blood to play this round. > beslin wrote: > so example combat card played during man/press step,giving you man/press,cost +1 blood? > They do. > beslin wrote: > how much there cost Thrown Gate ( Strike: 1R damage, with an optional maneuver.)? so give you both man+strike? > Only 1 additional blood. Superior only extends the subset of affected cards that cost +1 blood. > beslin wrote: > card giving man+press how works? example: > > Resist Earth's Grasp > Press, or maneuver with 1 optional press. > The same. Only +1 blood. groups.google.com/g/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/c/2GOLIrXAF8M/m/P4T3Dj6UNL0J Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

inm8

> Ankha wrote: > Yes, the card text was changed a long time ago by LSJ > Is there a reference for the mentioned change?