Aplocalypse VI
Bailleau-le-Pin, France
March 2nd, 2019
3R+F
12 players
www.vekn.net/event-calendar/event/9105
Kamel Senni
-- 2GW6 + 1,5 in final
Deck Name : Emerald Legionnaire
Author : Alain Greiner
Player: Kamel Senni
Crypt [12 vampires] Capacity min: 5 max: 10 average: 7.5 4x Erlik 10 AUS CEL FOR NEC THN Harbinger:3
2x Erebus 7 AUS FOR NEC dem Harbinger:3
2x Nicomedes 5 aus for nec vic Harbinger:4
1x Phagian 8 AUS NEC THA dom for Harbinger:4
1x Babalawo Alafin 7 AUS FOR NEC ani Harbinger:4
1x Zygodat 6 AUS NEC pot Harbinger:4
1x Solomon Batanea 5 AUS FOR nec Harbinger:4
Library [81 cards]
Action [8]
8x Disciple of Lazarus
Action Modifier [3]
1x Strange Day
2x Trochomancy
Action Modifier/Combat [3]
3x Breath of Thanatos
Action Modifier/Reaction [1]
1x Spectral Divination
Ally [8]
8x Emerald Legionnaire
Combat [22]
5x Hidden Strength
4x Rolling with the Punches
3x Target Vitals
4x Taste of Vitae
6x Weighted Walking Stick
Equipment [2]
1x Bowl of Convergence
1x Shaal Fragment
Event [2]
1x FBI Special Affairs Division
1x Unmasking, The
Master [16]
1x Dark Influences
1x Erciyes Fragments, The
1x Life Boon
3x Liquidation
1x Pentex(TM) Subversion
1x Powerbase: Luanda
1x Powerbase: Montreal
1x Rack, The
1x Smiling Jack, The Anarch
5x Villein
Reaction [16]
2x Delaying Tactics
5x Eyes of Argus
2x My Enemy's Enemy
3x On the Qui Vive
4x Telepathic Misdirection
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
What was the rest of the final table like?
"Oh, to the Hades with the manners! He's a complete bastard, and calling him that insults bastards everywhere!"
-Nalia De-Arnise
garourimgazette.wordpress.com/
www.vekn.net/forum-guidelines
Cheers.
The whole finals structure with deck archetypes always gives a lot more wholesome idea of how the tournament resolved. So always interesting information up front.
"Oh, to the Hades with the manners! He's a complete bastard, and calling him that insults bastards everywhere!"
-Nalia De-Arnise
garourimgazette.wordpress.com/
www.vekn.net/forum-guidelines
> Kraus wrote:
> Cheers.
>
> The whole finals structure with deck archetypes always gives a lot more wholesome idea of how the tournament resolved. So always interesting information up front.
>
Sure. I added the missing deck, a Enkidu / Nana / Nangile etc. rush.
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
> Ankha wrote:
> Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
>
So you're saying Legionnaires are OP?
> ResurrectioN wrote:
>
> > Ankha wrote:
> > Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
> >
> So you're saying Legionnaires are OP?
>
???
Romain was playing Malkavians.
Kamel was the one playing with Legionnaires...
Finnish Politics!
> Lönkka wrote:
>
> > ResurrectioN wrote:
> >
> > > Ankha wrote:
> > > Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
> > >
> > >
> > So you're saying Legionnaires are OP?
> >
> ???
>
> Romain was playing Malkavians.
> Kamel was the one playing with Legionnaires...
>
Well, some people read what they want to read...
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
> Ankha wrote:
>
> > Lönkka wrote:
> >
> > > ResurrectioN wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ankha wrote:
> > > > Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
> > > >
> > > >
> > > So you're saying Legionnaires are OP?
> > >
> > >
> > ???
> >
> > Romain was playing Malkavians.
> > Kamel was the one playing with Legionnaires...
> >
> Well, some people read what they want to read...
>
Preemptive April fools joke implying less than 10 games plus Malk Stealthbleed should be enough to put away Legionnaires and Enkidu multirush?
> Ankha wrote:
> Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
>
What is the point of this information? It suggests that his deck or play was bad in your opinion and you are trying to qualify the result. Why else would it be relevant?
> Mewcat wrote:
> What is the point of this information? It suggests that his deck or play was bad in your opinion and you are trying to qualify the result. Why else would it be relevant?
>
What is the point of this post?
Smoking craters tell no tales.
—Tex talks Battletech
> Bloodartist wrote:
>
> > Mewcat wrote:
> > What is the point of this information? It suggests that his deck or play was bad in your opinion and you are trying to qualify the result. Why else would it be relevant?
> >
> What is the point of this post?
>
To understand what idea he is trying to convey, commonly called communication.
> Mewcat wrote:
>
> > Ankha wrote:
> > Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
> >
> What is the point of this information? It suggests that his deck or play was bad in your opinion and you are trying to qualify the result. Why else would it be relevant?
>
Maybe it's only "giving glory" to a new player, to cheer him in front of an international audience...
Lurking in the underground of Bologna, Italy
> Mewcat wrote:
>
> > Ankha wrote:
> > Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
> >
> What is the point of this information? It suggests that his deck or play was bad in your opinion and you are trying to qualify the result. Why else would it be relevant?
>
On the contrary, it was a compliment, and a proof that "new" players shouldn't be afraid of playing tournaments.
Your way of thinking is a bit strange: how reaching a final on his first try and after only 6 games could be seen as bad?
EDIT: Thelonius got my point
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
> Ankha wrote:
>
> > Mewcat wrote:
> >
> > > Ankha wrote:
> > > Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
> > >
> > >
> > What is the point of this information? It suggests that his deck or play was bad in your opinion and you are trying to qualify the result. Why else would it be relevant?
> >
> On the contrary, it was a compliment, and a proof that "new" players shouldn't be afraid of playing tournaments.
>
> Your way of thinking is a bit strange: how reaching a final on his first try and after only 6 games could be seen as bad?
>
> EDIT: Thelonius got my point
>
I would have done the same with one of my hatchlings
Lurking in the underground of Bologna, Italy
> thelonius wrote:
>
> I would have done the same with one of my hatchlings
>
Any day, every day. My newlings deserve applause just for attending - all the more if they succeed in games!
"Oh, to the Hades with the manners! He's a complete bastard, and calling him that insults bastards everywhere!"
-Nalia De-Arnise
garourimgazette.wordpress.com/
www.vekn.net/forum-guidelines
> Ankha wrote:
>
> > Mewcat wrote:
> >
> > > Ankha wrote:
> > > Also, please notice that it was Romain's first tournament and final. Before that, he had played like 6 games
> > >
> > >
> > What is the point of this information? It suggests that his deck or play was bad in your opinion and you are trying to qualify the result. Why else would it be relevant?
> >
> On the contrary, it was a compliment, and a proof that "new" players shouldn't be afraid of playing tournaments.
>
> Your way of thinking is a bit strange: how reaching a final on his first try and after only 6 games could be seen as bad?
>
> EDIT: Thelonius got my point
>
Oh, sorry. The language used and that it followed directly after table seating gave me a different idea (that it was context for that).
Also human emotions sometimes perplex me.