rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

[SUBMISSION] Investment Banker

3 messages from 2 participants · 13 September 2015 – 16 September 2015 · vekn.net/forum
the topic on the V:EKN forum

TheLich

Name: J. Williford II Cardtype: Ally Unique Mortal Ally 1 Life 0 Bleed 0 Strength You must control an investment in order to play J. Williford II J. WIlliford II can move 1 blood from an investment you control to your pool or from the blood bank to an investment as a +1 Stealth Action. Part of a series of cards which try to make investment cards a valid mechanic.

Ankha

> TheLich wrote: > Name: J. Williford II > Cardtype: Ally > Cost: 1 Pool > Unique Mortal Ally > 1 Life 0 Bleed 0 Strength > J. WIlliford II can move 1 blood from an investment you control to your pool or from the blood bank to an investment as a +1 Stealth Action. > Burn J. Williford II if you control no Investment Cards. > > Part of a series of cards which try to make investment cards a valid mechanic. > He's weak enough not to have a burn clause (and not feed the Khazar). And he could cost 0 pool considering that otherwise he will recoup his cost only two turns later after three actions spent. Name: J. Williford II Cardtype: Ally Cost: 1 Pool Unique mortal ally with 1 life. 0 strength, 0 bleed. Requires an investment card. J. WIlliford II can move 1 blood from an investment card you control to your pool or from the blood bank to an investment card as a +1 stealth action. But I'd rather have a non-unique "banker" so I can play more than 1 (investment being so crappy). Name: Banker Cardtype: Ally Mortal ally with 1 life. 0 strength, 0 bleed. Requires an investment card. Banker can move 1 blood from an investment card you control to your pool or from the blood bank to an investment card as a +1 stealth action. Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

TheLich

The original card was non unique but only targeted a single investment. I wanted to raise the power but was concerned about making it too powerful. The addition of the Requires an investment does fit better than the Burn clause. Thanks.