This is ALFA Version of the survey
Please provide your comments and ideas regarding the survey.
Danse Macabre feedback survey
By answering this survey you are helping us to create even better extensions in the future….
1 GENERAL QUESTIONS REGARDING EXTENSION.
1.1 Did you tested Danse Macabre cards?
I tested new cards and feel competent to provide general and detailed feedback
I tested new cards and feel competent to provide general feedback
I tested new card but do not feel competent to provide feedback
I didn’t test new cards
Other answer…………..
No answer
1.2 Are you planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future ?
Yes
No
Other answer…….
No answer
If 1.2 No
What is the reason you are not planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future
- I don’t have time to play at all
- I don’t like the extension
- I don’t like the extension publishing form (self printing)
If you feel competent to provide general feedback please assess Danse Macabre extension in the areas mentioned below.
1.3 Mechanics level of new cards
Very good
Good
Avarage
Bad
Very Bad
Other answer…………..
No answer
1.4 Artistic level level of new cards
Very good
Good
Avarage
Bad
Very Bad
Other answer…………..
No answer
1.5 Technical level of card publication
Very good
Good
Avarage
Bad
Very Bad
Other answer…………..
No answer
2 DETAIL DANSE MACABRE CARDS ASSESMENT
Please assess the power of anly if you feel competent
For each card the following question:
Very good card
Good card
Average card
Week card
Wallpaper
VEKN Marketing CoDirector
Hello,
based on the confusion I had afte rthe first question, I suggest to not use the word "tested".
For me, that seemed at first to imply that this was asking if I was one of the play-testers.
I suggest "Did you already use.Dansse Macabre cards?"
"It was a perfect plan - until it had contact with reality"
---
Hardy Range
Playgroup Tradition Compliance Manager
My corrections
> Migalart wrote:
> This is ALPHA Version of the survey.
> Please provide your comments and ideas regarding this survey.
>
> Danse Macabre feedback survey
>
> By answering this survey you are helping us to create even better expansion sets in the future….
>
> 1 GENERAL QUESTIONS REGARDING EXTENSION.
>
> 1.1 Have you included and played withDanse Macabre cards in your decks?
> I've played with the new cards and I'm willing to to provide general and detailed feedback.
> I've played with the new cards and I'm willing to to provide general feedback.
> I've played with the new card but do not feel competent to provide feedback or don't want to.
> I've played with the new cards.
> Other answer…………..
> No answer.
>
> 1.2 Are you planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future ?
> Yes
> No
> Other answer…….
> No answer
>
> If 1.2 No
> What is the reason you are not planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future
> - I don’t have time to play at all
> - I don’t like this expansion set
> - I don’t like the expansion set publishing form (self printing)
>
> If you feel competent and are willing to provide general feedback, please give your opinion for the following:
>
> 1.3 How do you feel about the mechanics used by the new cards (balance, complexity...)
> Very good
> Good
> Avarage
> Bad
> Very Bad
> Other answer…………..
> No answer
>
> 1.4 How do you feel about the art used on the nex cards?
> Very good
> Good
> Avarage
> Bad
> Very Bad
> Other answer…………..
> No answer
>
> 1.5 Technical level of card publication ???
> Very good
> Good
> Avarage
> Bad
> Very Bad
> Other answer…………..
> No answer
>
> 2 Give us a detailed opinion about each card (you may skip cards you don't feel competent about or you don't want to comment)
>
> For each card, what is your feeling?
> It's a very good card
> It's a good card
> It's an average card
> It's a week card
> It's wallpaper
>
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
> Migalart wrote:
> 1.5 Technical level of card publication
> Very good
> Good
> Average
> Bad
> Very Bad
> Other answer…………..
> No answer
>
I don't understand this question. Do you mean the way the cards are distributed and made ready for printing?
www.facebook.com/groups/vtes.belgium/
after corrections i will prepare online version
now it is time to propose other questions, delete questions, etc
or help me to correct my poor english.... (thanks Ankha)
VEKN Marketing CoDirector
I don't understand question 1.5.
For 1.3 description is not clear.It is to general. What do you mean? power level, quality of card text description (it's clear, doesn't need clarifications), balance, freshness (bringing new ideas instead of copying old effects), staying close to WoD, etc.
How are Technical and Mechanics different for 1.5 and 1.3?
For question 2, I'd ask in a different way:
Broad Power Card (Must have in every deck)
Specific Power Card (Must have in specific decks)
Broad Useful Card (Will often see play in most of my decks)
Specific Useful Card (Will often see play in specific decks)
Corner Case Card (Will occasionally see play in unusual situations)
I will never play this card.
{And then have a question if they check the last one "Why would you never play this card?}
> alek wrote:
> could you create online version of the survey?
>
He is.
This is just the preliminary one to iron out all the problems beforehand.
You know, for proofreading and stuff...
Finnish Politics!
> Ankha wrote:
> My corrections
> This is ALPHA Version of the survey.
> Please provide your comments and ideas regarding this survey.
>
> Danse Macabre feedback survey
>
> By answering this survey you are helping us to create even better expansion sets in the future….
>
> 1 GENERAL QUESTIONS REGARDING EXTENSION.
>
> 1.1 Have you included and played withDanse Macabre cards in your decks?
> I've played with the new cards and I'm willing to to provide general and detailed feedback.
> I've played with the new cards and I'm willing to to provide general feedback.
> I've played with the new card but do not feel competent to provide feedback or don't want to.
> I've played with the new cards.
> Other answer…………..
> No answer.
>
Not sure what "I've played with th new cards" should refer to (as there's already a section for "played + feedback" and "played + no feedback").
"I haven't played with the new cards." would be more relevent.
Or "I haven't included any Danse Macabre cards in my deck, but I've seen them played by my opponents [and {would like to / don't feel like giving} feedback over them]"
> Ankha wrote:
> 1.2 Are you planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future ?
> Yes
> No
> Other answer…….
> No answer
>
> Ankha wrote:
> If 1.2 No
> What is the reason you are not planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future
> - I don’t have time to play at all
> - I don’t like this expansion set
> - I don’t like the expansion set publishing format(self printing)
>
> Ankha wrote:
> If you feel competent and are willing to provide general feedback, please give your opinion on the following:
>
> Ankha wrote:
> 1.3 How do you feel about the mechanics used by the new cards (balance, complexity...)
> Very good
> Good
> Avarage
> Bad
> Very Bad
> Other answer…………..
> No answer
>
Now, that's going to be a tricky question. What should people do if they think one card is overpowered, and another one is complete rubbish?
You're going to have lots of "other answers" for this.
> Ankha wrote:
> 1.4 How do you feel about the art used on the nex cards?
> Very good
> Good
> Avarage
> Bad
> Very Bad
> Other answer…………..
> No answer
>
> Ankha wrote:
> 1.5 Technical level of card publication ???
> Very good
> Good
> Avarage
> Bad
> Very Bad
> Other answer…………..
> No answer
>
Same as Vincent - I don't understand this question. Can you rephrase?
> Ankha wrote:
> 2 Give us a detailed opinion about each card (you may skip cards you don't feel competent about or you don't want to comment)
>
> For each card, what is your feeling?
> It's a very good card
> It's a good card
> It's an average card
> It's a week card
> It's wallpaper
>
I STRONGLY recommend NOT using "competent", since you never defined what it requires to be competent in giving opinions. Scrap all occurrences.
"Please give us your opinion on the cards you wish to comment - you don't have to comment everything.
> Pascal wrote:
>
> > Ankha wrote:
> > 1.3 How do you feel about the mechanics used by the new cards (balance, complexity...)
> > Very good
> > Good
> > Avarage
> > Bad
> > Very Bad
> > Other answer…………..
> > No answer
> >
> Now, that's going to be a tricky question. What should people do if they think one card is overpowered, and another one is complete rubbish?
> You're going to have lots of "other answers" for this.
>
We're talking about mechanics, but since there's no real new mechanics in the cards, we can remove this question.
> Pascal wrote:
>
> > Ankha wrote:
> > 2 Give us a detailed opinion about each card (you may skip cards you don't feel competent about or you don't want to comment)
> >
> > For each card, what is your feeling?
> > It's a very good card
> > It's a good card
> > It's an average card
> > It's a week card
> > It's wallpaper
> >
> I STRONGLY recommend NOT using "competent", since you never defined what it requires to be competent in giving opinions. Scrap all occurrences.
> "Please give us your opinion on the cards you wish to comment - you don't have to comment everything.
>
I agree. I removed it from the previous questions but left it in the last question for some unclear reasons.
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
> Ankha wrote:
>
> > Pascal wrote:
> > I STRONGLY recommend NOT using "competent", since you never defined what it requires to be competent in giving opinions. Scrap all occurrences.
> > "Please give us your opinion on the cards you wish to comment - you don't have to comment everything.
> >
> I agree. I removed it from the previous questions but left it in the last question for some unclear reasons.
>
It's still in the 1.1 question