Well fellow methuselahs,
I was studying the possibility of combining both Derange and Freak Drive in the same deck and came to the following question.
Player A controls:
-Anatole
-J. Oswald
-Catherine du Bois
Player B controls:
-Adana de Sforza
-Rafael de Corazón
-Anarch Convert
Can be the following actions be done?
Anatole: Derange -> Catherine
Catherine: Derange -> Anarch Convert -> Freak Drive
Catherine: Derange on her -> Adana -> Freak Drive
J. Oswald: Derange -> Catherine
*till here everything OK*
Catherine: Derange on her -> Rafael de Corazón
(no more Derange on Catherine and all Player B's vamps are Malkavian)
Hypothesis:
I understand that it is possible, since each Derange has it's own card text, similar to the ruling about Anarch Revolt and Delaying Tactics.
Just wanted to check if it's really possible.
Thanks!
> cordovader wrote:
> Catherine: Derange on her -> Lutz -> Freak Drive
>
As Lutz is a Malkavian, that would not be allowed, due to card text of Derange.
Which you omitted, so I give it here:
>
> Derange
> Type: Action
> Requires: Malkavian/Malkavian antitribu
> This is a +1 stealth action.
> Put this card on a younger vampire. The vampire with this card is considered to be the same clan as the acting vampire. The vampire with this card does not untap as normal. During his or her controller's untap phase, he or she may burn 1 blood to untap. The vampire with this card may move it to another vampire as a action. This card cannot be placed on a Malkavian or Malkavian antitribu.
>
Other than this, I think your idea would indeed work (i.e., each Derange has its own card text, as you phrase it).
"It was a perfect plan - until it had contact with reality"
---
Hardy Range
Playgroup Tradition Compliance Manager
> hardyrange wrote:
>
> > cordovader wrote:
> > Catherine: Derange on her -> Lutz -> Freak Drive
> >
> As Lutz is a Malkavian, that would not be allowed, due to card text of Derange.
>
> Which you omitted, so I give it here:
> >
> > Derange
> > Type: Action
> > Requires: Malkavian/Malkavian antitribu
> > This is a +1 stealth action.
> > Put this card on a younger vampire. The vampire with this card is considered to be the same clan as the acting vampire. The vampire with this card does not untap as normal. During his or her controller's untap phase, he or she may burn 1 blood to untap. The vampire with this card may move it to another vampire as a action. This card cannot be placed on a Malkavian or Malkavian antitribu.
> >
> Other than this, I think your idea would indeed work (i.e., each Derange has its own card text, as you phrase it).
>
Changed Lutz by Adana, but you got the point.
> cordovader wrote:
> Well fellow methuselahs,
>
> I was studying the possibility of combining both Derange and Freak Drive in the same deck and came to the following question.
>
> Player A controls:
>
> -Anatole
> -J. Oswald
> -Catherine du Bois
>
> Player B controls:
>
> -Adana de Sforza
> -Rafael de Corazón
> -Anarch Convert
>
> Can be the following actions be done?
>
> Anatole: Derange -> Catherine
> Catherine: Derange -> Anarch Convert -> Freak Drive
> Catherine: Derange on her -> Adana -> Freak Drive
> J. Oswald: Derange -> Catherine
>
> *till here everything OK*
>
> Catherine: Derange on her -> Rafael de Corazón
> (no more Derange on Catherine and all Player B's vamps are Malkavian)
>
> Hypothesis:
>
> I understand that it is possible, since each Derange has it's own card text, similar to the ruling about Anarch Revolt and Delaying Tactics.
>
> Just wanted to check if it's really possible.
>
> Thanks!
>
It is.