Card idea: Your politics are mine

Name: Your politics are mine Cardtype: Political Action Requires a priscus, cardinal or regent Remove from the games X political action from any other Methuselahs ash heap. Then allocate X points among two or more other Methuselahs. Successful referendum means each Methuselah burns 1 pool for each point assigned. It could be useless or very very powerfull, but less and less each time you call it. If the vote fail or is canceled the next one will be weak. The "other Methuselahs" condition limit the power of the card not usable in duel and not in your ash heap. If one of the other Methuselahs had lots of political card in his ash heap that mean he play politics and that mean you wil have to discuss with him. Excepted "legacy of pander" and "lassombra presence" there are few sabbat voting decks. This card could create an explosion or make nothing (depanding of the metagame), but it I think could only be a "surprise" card with one or two copy maximum in some particular deck. Thoughts? Regards, Guilhem Chuck Norris and Superman once fought each other on a bet. The loser had to start wearing his underwear on the outside of his pants

Fixed card text. Name: Your politics are mine Cardtype: Political Action Requires a priscus, cardinal or regent. Remove X political action cards from any other Methuselahs' ash heap from the game and allocate X points among two or more other Methuselahs. Successful referendum means each Methuselah burns 1 pool for each point assigned. Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

So, you must have significant political power to make this pass (since if you don't, you're not too likely to pass it), and you need other player playing a significant number of political action. It's way too narrow. Also, I can't see a use of removing political action ; political action + Ashur is not exactly a problem. So, it's not even a anti-ash heap meta. A reaction that give vote on number of political action removed could possibly see use, and would make Delaying Tactic a bit less dominant as anti-political.

Ohlmann wrote: > > So, you must have significant political power to make this pass (since if you don't, you're not too likely to pass it), and you need other player playing a significant number of political action. It's way too narrow. > You chose the X (according to the number of cards you remove) and you chose the target, so you can deal, or you can kill after clean up vampire voting deck Ohlmann wrote: > > Also, I can't see a use of removing political action ; political action + Ashur is not exactly a problem. So, it's not even a anti-ash heap meta. > The remove condition is there to restrict the power, if you call several times this vote the number of the possible X will decrease each time. Ohlmann wrote: > > A reaction that give vote on number of political action removed could possibly see use, and would make Delaying Tactic a bit less dominant as anti-political. > Could be an Idea Chuck Norris and Superman once fought each other on a bet. The loser had to start wearing his underwear on the outside of his pants