Hi Fellas,
new here so I hope I'm not making any faux-pas.
In last night's game, my opponent played a card which gave him an extra master phase (the parthenon, I think) and also had a vampire which allowed him a further extra master phase.
he then proceeded to use Golconda: Inner peace on me, in each of those master phases. is this allowed? is there a limitation on the cards played during multiple master phases?
thanks in advance
> tarantulus wrote:
> Hi Fellas,
>
> new here so I hope I'm not making any faux-pas.
>
> In last night's game, my opponent played a card which gave him an extra master phase (the parthenon, I think) and also had a vampire which allowed him a further extra master phase.
>
> he then proceeded to use Golconda: Inner peace on me, in each of those master phases. is this allowed?
>
Yes
> tarantulus wrote:
> is there a limitation on the cards played during multiple master phases?
>
No, there's no limitation (except by card text, which is not the case here).
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
> tarantulus wrote:
> Hi Fellas,
>
> new here so I hope I'm not making any faux-pas.
>
Definitely not, this is precisely the place to ask Rules questions
> tarantulus wrote:
> In last night's game, my opponent played a card which gave him an extra master phase (the parthenon, I think) and also had a vampire which allowed him a further extra master phase.
>
> he then proceeded to use Golconda: Inner peace on me, in each of those master phases. is this allowed? is there a limitation on the cards played during multiple master phases?
>
> thanks in advance
>
It's important to notice that some cards go in play, while other are moved to the ash heap when played - this is Rulebook 1.6.1 .
Golconda, Inner Peace doesn't state it is put in play, so it goes to the ash heap when it is played. Therefore, when your opponent played his first Golconda, it should have been placed his/her ash heap. If your opponent had another Golconda in hand, playing it is perfectly valid.
> Pascal wrote:
> If your opponent had another Golconda in hand, playing it is perfectly valid.
>
this was the case, I just got unlucky I suppose.
thanks everybody