rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

BEST CARD EVER - GIANTS BLOOD

22 messages from 12 participants · 28 August 2012 – 29 August 2012 · vekn.net/forum
the topic on the V:EKN forum

mirddes

anyone care to politely disagree? UDHR18/19/27

Ankha

It's a great card but you can't really rely on it: - the first player who plays it win - to take advantage of it (in matter of pool gain), you need to play Villein first (or Minion Tap) If all 5 players have a Giant's Blood in their deck, it will be a dead card for 4 of them. But feel free to build decks with 10 Giant's Blood in them if you want Prince of Paris, France Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

Ohlmann

It's an average card. From time to time, it will be very good, most of the time it will be passable. Quite frankly, if you think it is even an excellent card, it mean you either never played dominate or don't understand how it work.

Ashur

> mirddes wrote: > anyone care to politely disagree? > Care to explain why I should politely disagree? (And why you use caps in the topic?) "My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."

Kiddo

I stopped playing with Giant's Blood - there are too many conditions to be met to have it worthwhile being played AND there is such a high chance of contesting the use of it in tournament environment that I'd rather just spend my master slot on something I'll use whenever it comes and regardless of what other players are playing. Far from it that GB is a bad card, it certainly isn't, but it is for me very far from auto-include when i build my decks, even with fatties...

Ashur

> Kiddo wrote: > I stopped playing with Giant's Blood - there are too many conditions to be met to have it worthwhile being played AND there is such a high chance of contesting the use of it in tournament environment that I'd rather just spend my master slot on something I'll use whenever it comes and regardless of what other players are playing. > This was exactly my thought up until recently. Now I use it in every deck and often play it as soon as I draw it, just to prevent others from using it directly after Villein on a fattie - that is just too good. "My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."

Izaak

Giant's Blood is ridiculously good. It was quite playable before Villein, after Villein it's almost a must-include if only -as Ashur pointed out- to prevent someone else from getting a free 10-cap.

Ohlmann

> Izaak wrote: > Giant's Blood is ridiculously good. > You stretch the definition of ridiculously good. One time out of ten game, it will be extremely good. THe other nine game, another one will have played it first, or you will have played to gain 2-4 blood to make sure nobody beat you to it. In any case, one thing you will surely agree upon is that you can't base strategy upon Giant Blood. You put it into your deck because it's almost alway a good thing to have, but it's not strategy-defining like Govern can be, or even a solid support like bleed redirection or Freak Drive. It's the lottery card that give you a solid advantage one game out of ten.

Klaital

This seriously looks like a troll topic to me...

Pascal Bertrand

> mirddes wrote: > anyone care to politely disagree? > I kindly disagree. I hope that was polite enough

Izaak

> You stretch the definition of ridiculously good. > That depends on your definition of ridiculously good. Or even good. It fits mine just fine, but then again I´m all for banning it because of the stupid lottery aspect. The problem with Giant's Blood is that it's not a concious deck construction decision whether or not you play it. You play it by default unless you specifically decide not to. And even then, your deck probably would be better with a copy in there.

Ohlmann

> Izaak wrote: > I´m all for banning it because of the stupid lottery aspect. > > The problem with Giant's Blood is that it's not a concious deck construction decision whether or not you play it. You play it by default unless you specifically decide not to. And even then, your deck probably would be better with a copy in there. > I agree wholeheartedly with the lottery aspect and the fact it's not a conscious deck construction decision. It take only one slot, it's almost alway worth the master action, and you will almost never choke on it. Where I beg to differ is that it is very good. Is a deck changed by removing the giant blood from it ? usually not. It will be a bit less good and won't have a chance to suddenly gain lot of blood, but it will still be playable and keep the same ability to gain victory point. I am personnaly against the ban, but only because ban or errata are for disruptive card. I don't think the effect of Giant Blood is powerful enough to warrant such a drastic mesure.

Klaital

I don't play a giant's blood in nearly every deck I play, only in those with 7+ capacity vampires usually. Or in decks that I know will spend blood like crazy.

Haze

instead of giants blood i just play 10 copies of Life in the City so eventually i get my 10cap vampire for free.

mirddes

> Ashur wrote: > > > mirddes wrote: > > anyone care to politely disagree? > > > Care to explain why I should politely disagree? (And why you use caps in the topic?) > Creates insightful discussion. Caps indicate enthusiasm. > Klaital wrote: > This seriously looks like a troll topic to me... > I troll not, i don't have a bridge. besides, a lovely mod suggested such a topic be created. have a great day. UDHR18/19/27

brandonsantacruz

> mirddes wrote: > > > Ashur wrote: > > > > > mirddes wrote: > > > anyone care to politely disagree? > > > > > Care to explain why I should politely disagree? (And why you use caps in the topic?) > > > Creates insightful discussion. Caps indicate enthusiasm. > > > Klaital wrote: > > This seriously looks like a troll topic to me... > > > I troll not, i don't have a bridge. > > besides, a lovely mod suggested such a topic be created. > > have a great day. > Joel? Joel the troll is that you? Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one. -Friedrich Nietzsche brandonsantacruz.blogspot.com/

Ohlmann

> mirddes wrote: > Caps indicate enthusiasm. > Cas indicate rudeness.

Lönkka

> Ohlmann wrote: > Cas indicate rudeness. > I think so too. Also, to me "have a nice day" always reads "eff u". Especially when coming out of telemarketeer's mouth after she failed to sell me anything... Finnish Politics!

mirddes

i frequently tell strangers walking past on the street to have a great day. perception is reality. have a great night my fellow Methuselah! (appropriately themed variant) UDHR18/19/27

KevinM

Since this topic has now degenerated into accusing a poster of posting incorrectly because he used caps, can we PLEASE lock this topic? Thank you. Kevin M., Prince of Las Vegas "Know your enemy and know yourself; in one-thousand battles you shall never be in peril." -- Sun Tzu, *The Art of War* "Contentment...Complacency...Catastrophe!" -- Joseph Chevalier Please visit VTESville daily! vtesville.myminicity.com/ Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/129744447064017

Pascal Bertrand

> KevinM wrote: > PLEASE > Caps!

Kiddo

How about we just ignore this topic* and let it slide into oblivion, where it belongs? *yes, I'm aware of the irony of advocating ignoring while replying in the same topic