If you ever wanted to sit at a table, do a looooooong round and then go away saying that you'll do nothing for the rest of the game ruining your predator's game then this is the deck for you.
If you encounter a card that you haven't played, play it, otherwise hunt and Freak Drive. Depending on the draw, you might be sitting on 179 pool at the end of the "big" round.
You will most likely be allowed to withdraw, so there's a very good chance for a VP.
Deck Name : Trolololol
Crypt [12 vampires] Capacity min: 7 max: 7 average: 7
12x Rabbat, The Sewer Goddess (7) Nosferatu (group 4)
Library [90 cards]
Action [3]
3x Clan Impersonation
Action Modifier [81]
81x Freak Drive
Equipment [6]
3x Aaron's Feeding Razor
3x Journal of Hrorsh
Crafted with : Anarch Revolt Deck Builder. [Thu Feb 23 21:36:14 2012]
P.S. Not serious
> Lemminkäinen wrote:
> You will most likely be allowed to withdraw, so there's a very good chance for a VP.
>
Withdrawal is only .5 VP.
Better to be the last player at the time out, and let your opponent withdraw...
> dude_PL wrote:
> cool stuff, but I still prefer beast with 88 increased strength, immortal and burning wrath
>
But that doesn't get you a 100+ pool to discourage your predator with.
> Adonai wrote:
>
> > Lemminkäinen wrote:
> > You will most likely be allowed to withdraw, so there's a very good chance for a VP.
> >
> Withdrawal is only .5 VP.
> Better to be the last player at the time out, and let your opponent withdraw...
>
I totally meant to write "half a VP". Apologies.
> Azel wrote:
> Wouldn't you have to throw in 1 copy of Anarch Convert to qualify for the "play to win" rule?
>
Changing six Rabbats into random 1-cap weenies might land you an oust if your grandprey is salmon rushing... and it wouldn't still be really playing to win
> Lemminkäinen wrote:
>
> > dude_PL wrote:
> > cool stuff, but I still prefer beast with 88 increased strength, immortal and burning wrath
> >
> But that doesn't get you a 100+ pool to discourage your predator with.
>
true, but on the other hand, you do get a punch of your lifetime can't have everything I guess
Here's my version of the Rabbat deck.
Can't remember where the idea of Rabbat + Temptation comes from ..
Deck Name: Rabbat 0.2
Author: fZd
Description:
Second attempt.
Should I remove Camera Phone?
Crypt (13 cards; Capacity min=2 max=7 avg=5.31)
===============================================
1x Allonzo Montoya 6 ani aus OBF SER Abomination:3
1x Belle Equitone 2 ser Follower of Set:4
1x Black Lotus 5 aus obf ser DOM Follower of Set:4
1x Charlie Tyne 4 obf pro ser !Gangrel:4
5x Rabbat, The Sewer Goddess 7 pot ANI FOR OBF Nosferatu:4
1x Renenet 5 ser OBF PRE Follower of Set:4
1x Reverend Djoser Jones 3 pre ser Follower of Set:4
1x Sahira Siraj 4 obf ser tha Follower of Set:4
1x Zhenga 5 obf pre SER Follower of Set:4
Library (77 cards)
==================
Master (17)
3x Ashur Tablets
1x Heidelberg Castle, Germany
2x Life Boon
1x Opium Den
1x Pentex(TM) Subversion
2x Secure Haven
1x Vessel
6x Villein
Action (24)
2x Blithe Acceptance
2x Clan Impersonation
1x Form of Corruption
2x Psychic Veil
17x Temptation
Equipment (9)
1x Camera Phone
2x Journal of Hrorsh
1x Sargon Fragment, The
4x Flak Jacket
1x Unlicensed Taxicab
Ally (5)
1x Amam the Devourer (Bane Mummy)
1x Kherebutu (Bane Mummy)
1x Nephren-Ka
1x Qetu the Evil Doer (Bane Mummy)
1x Tutu the Doubly Evil One (Bane Mummy)
Action Modifier (10)
4x Cloak the Gathering
2x Faceless Night
1x Hidden Lurker
3x Lost in Crowds
Combat (7)
3x Skin of Rock
4x Soak
Combo (5)
5x Swallowed by the Night
Created with Secret Library v0.9.3. (Feb 24, 2012 16:02:14)
> Pascal wrote:
> Here's my version of the Rabbat deck.
> Can't remember where the idea of Rabbat + Temptation comes from ..
>
from a long discussion (drunken) during an EC ? it sounds good.
> Pascal wrote:
> Here's my version of the Rabbat deck.
> Can't remember where the idea of Rabbat + Temptation comes from ..
>
It's missing a Sunset Strip, Hollywood.
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director