This is the third poll of the four "problematic" cards.
After we had a decent discussion about Giant's Blood now comes the poll. There were arguments against the card and for the card. Please read through those arguments and make your decision about wether and in what way the card should be changed in your opinion.
Giant's Blood [Jyhad:R, VTES:R, CE:R, LoB:PG, Third:R, LotN:PG, KoT:R/PM]
Cardtype: Master
Master.
Fill a vampire to full capacity with blood from the blood bank. Only one Giant's Blood can be played in a game.
The poll is up for three weeks from now on. Please tell everybody about it so we can get a most significant result out of a broad participation.
Please keep in mind that the result however is the opinion of all participants which does not mean it is that of all players.
Furthermore the outcome of this poll does not necessarily mean something changes or stay the same.
Baron of Frankfurt
> Pascal wrote:
> I suppose you're missing the "Change from 1 per game" to "1 per player per game", which I've read quite some times
>
Interesting, I have never taken that into consideration ...
National Coordinator Germany nc [dot] germany [at] magenta [dot] de
> Pascal wrote:
> I suppose you're missing the "Change from 1 per game" to "1 per player per game", which I've read quite some times
>
I have heard others mention this possibility as well. But here's how I see that change playing out:
It will increase the proliferation of Villein/Giant's Blood decks.
Now, as you know, I want to keep Villein intact. But making GB once per player per game means there is no downside to including at least one copy per deck, for EVERY deck. You could potentially have every Methuselah gain 9-11 pool on turn 4. That's kind of messed up.
With it being once per game, there is an inherent risk to playing the card. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
> Pascal wrote:
> I suppose you're missing the "Change from 1 per game" to "1 per player per game", which I've read quite some times
>
Well, actually nobody mentioned that option in the discussion.
Baron of Frankfurt