hsm...@garfield.msms.doe.k12.ms.us (Harry Smith) writes:
>James Puzzo (jam...@gw.digibd.com) wrote:
>We had a conflict recently over directed actions being directed against
>one's self. The situation was: another Methuslah had Darius Styx
>(Ravnos) and tried to use his special power ("As a (D) action, Darius
>may pick one card at random from a Methuselah's hand. If it is an
>equipment or retainer card, place it on Darius at no cost; otherwise,
>return it to the Methuselah's hand.") on himself, thus getting free
>equipment. Would the card override the rules about D actions (it does
>say 'A Methuselah's hand'), or would this just be a case of errata?
>Another question also came up, does Darius's controler get to look at the
>card picked? Otherwise, the other player might just lie and say that it
>was not an equipment card when it actually was. However, if it was not,
>the controller just got a free peek. Yet a third question
>comes to mind. What if the card picked IS a retainer or equipment, but
>Darius does not qualify to get it (say, it requires Giovanni)? Does he
>get it anyway, since his card makes no mention of anything like that?
1. (D) actins cannot be self-directed unless card text indicates otherwise.
2. Even if Darius could pull from his controller's hand (which he cannot),
he would still pull "at random" - let some other Methuselah pull the
card if no seven-sided die is handy.
3. Darius' controller looks at the card pulled, regardless of type.
4. Darius may be equipped or may employ without regard to qualifications
such as skill or clan.
--
L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | These opinions are mine and
http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | are subject to card text.
Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger. |