rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

New LSJ rulings, in case you missed it

2 messages from 2 participants · 13 November 2006 – 14 November 2006
original thread on Google Groups

John Flournoy

Since this seems to have slipped past at least a few people, two rules reversals on fairly basic game concepts (declaring additional strikes and declaring damage prevention) from this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/browse_frm/thread/fb7f87cc0a1888cf/?hl=en# ---------- LSJ wrote: > Myrdin wrote: > > LSJ skrev: > >> REVERSAL: the gaining of additional strikes is subject to 1.6.1.5 (just like > >> the gaining of maneuvers, &c.) > >> > >> So if the acting minion declines, but the blocking minion then gains > >> additionals, the acting minion can respond by gaining additionals of his own. > > > > Does this ruling also cover damage prevention? > > > > Say acting minion is hit by 1(one) and declines to prevent, opposing > > minion is hit by 1(one) and prevents that damage. Can the acting minion > > then prevent his damage too? For example to avoid getting hit by a > > pulled fangs/disarm etc. > > Yes. (Also a reversal). -------------- -John Flournoy

LSJ

John Flournoy wrote: > Since this seems to have slipped past at least a few people, two rules > reversals on fairly basic game concepts (declaring additional strikes > and declaring damage prevention) from this thread: And don't forget to subscribe to vtes-...@yahoogroups.com, so you'll get all rulings reversals, errata, and new rulings delivered right to your mailbox. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vtes-rules/ [ quoted text not captured ]