Succubus Club and Great Beast

Just checking to ensure I have things straight: I would guess that, if Call the Great Beast were Traded via Succubus Club to another Methuselah, then card text references to "this Baali" (etc.) would still refer to the original acting Baali. Right? Thus, only the original acting Baali: - May be considered the vampire the card is "on"? - May take an action to put a Ritual Counter on the card (now a directed action)? - Is Burned when there are more than 10 Ritual Counters? But now someone else controls the Great Beast when it becomes a Vampire?

[ quoted text not captured ] I hope that LSJ refuses to answer this until you tell us why why WHY you want to do this!! :p /Henrik Isaksson

Nystulc wrote: > Just checking to ensure I have things straight: > > I would guess that, if Call the Great Beast were Traded via Succubus Club to > another Methuselah, then card text references to "this Baali" (etc.) would > still refer to the original acting Baali. Right? > > Thus, only the original acting Baali: > - May be considered the vampire the card is "on"? Correct. The card actually remains on that Baali, since nothing has moved it. > - May take an action to put a Ritual Counter on the card (now a directed > action)? Correct. > - Is Burned when there are more than 10 Ritual Counters? Sure. > But now someone else controls the Great Beast when it becomes a Vampire? Yes. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/