rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Marciana Giovanni Errata

3 messages from 3 participants · 30 November 2007 – 01 December 2007
original thread on Google Groups

Jeff Kuta

From the WW site at http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=cardlist Marciana Giovanni Independent: Bleed actions cost Marciana an additional blood. Tap Marciana and choose a non-Sabbat vampire to allow that vampire to burn 1 blood to get +1 intercept <for the current action>. Can she be errata'ed to say "Tap Marciana *to* choose a non-Sabbat vampire..." Just a nicer template is all since we had a question about this in a game. Thanks! Jeff

LSJ

[ quoted text not captured ] Do X and do Y to do Z. vs. Do X to do Y to do Z. It seems the former is the "nicer template".

Wookie813

On Nov 30, 1:55 pm, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > Jeff Kuta wrote: > > From the WW site athttp://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=cardlist [ quoted text not captured ] Some might try to choose a non-sabbat vampire any time they tap Marciana. I.e. "I attempt to block with Marciana." "You succeed." *Tap Marcianna* "I choose [vampire x] for her special." I'm not saying *I* would interpret it thusly, but some might. The use of *to* instead of *and* might more clearly define the intention, however I think "You may tap Marciana to choose a non-sabbat..." or "Marciana may tap to choose..." might be even more clear.