LSJ#
Robert Goudie wrote:
>
> "LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message
> news:3A9BEE86...@white-wolf.com...
> > rogc...@student.luth.se wrote:
> > >
> > > If you play DI on someone who plays a card to get an additional strike,
> may he
> > > play another card to gain one that round?
> >
> > Yes. The restriction (given in 6.4.3) is on gaining additional strikes
> from
> > more than one "card or effect". Since he hasn't gained any additional
> strikes
> > from the canceled card, he's free to use a card or effect to gain some.
>
> From 6.4.3: "A minion cannot use more than one card or effect to gain
> additional strikes per round of combat." If, instead of 'use', the rules
> said "cannot play more than 1 card" then the DI'd card would still be
> considered played and an additional card couldn't be played, right? Did any
> prior versions of the rulebook use the 'cannot play' terminology or is my
> memory doing me a disservice?
If it said "play" (and meant it the way you indicate above), then it
wouldn't prevent a player from gaining additional strikes from a card in
play (Vial of Garou blood) in addition to the additional strikes from his
card.
Jyhad: "Only one card may give an additional strike..." [15.1]
V:TES: "Only one additional strike card may be used..." [21]
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/