rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Q: on Gangrel De-evolution

6 messages from 5 participants · 02 September 1995 – 06 September 1995
original thread on Google Groups

L. Scott Johnson

lche...@starnet.gov.sg (Lee Chew Hung) writes: >I'm new to the game and needs help on Gangrel De-evolution. >Does it apply to all Gangrels or must it be played on a specific >Gangrel ? It applies to a specific instance of a named vampire, but the card itself is not "played on" the vampire. If the Methuselah doing the de-evolving is ousted, the Gangrel is still bleed-deficient. If the Gangrel is Contested and yielded, the new copy will not be so bleed-deficient. -- L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | These opinions are mine and http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | are subject to card text. Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rulemonger. |

Lee Chew Hung

I'm new to the game and needs help on Gangrel De-evolution. Does it apply to all Gangrels or must it be played on a specific Gangrel ? Thanks. Lee Chew Hung lche...@starnet.gov.sg

James C. Clover

sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu (L. Scott Johnson) writes: >It applies to a specific instance of a named vampire, but the card itself >is not "played on" the vampire. If the Methuselah doing the de-evolving >is ousted, the Gangrel is still bleed-deficient. Don't you have to keep the Gangrel-D "on" the victim vampire? In that case, the golden rule applies. Otherwise, how are you supposed to remember whether or which Gangrel had sprouted a tail? -- Simeon ---------------------------- simeo...@bbs.fullcoll.edu

L. Scott Johnson

jcl...@netcom.com (James C. Clover) writes: >sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu (L. Scott Johnson) writes: >>It applies to a specific instance of a named vampire, but the card itself >>is not "played on" the vampire. If the Methuselah doing the de-evolving >>is ousted, the Gangrel is still bleed-deficient. >Don't you have to keep the Gangrel-D "on" the victim vampire? In that >case, the golden rule applies. >Otherwise, how are you supposed to remember whether or which Gangrel had >sprouted a tail? You simply remember. You may leave the card out to aid your memory, but the Golden Rule of card ownership does not cause the effect to cease. Reference: Newsgroups: rec.games.deckmaster Subject: NEW: Rulings summary for Jyhad Date: 9 Nov 1994 13:11:24 -0800 Message-ID: <39rdts$s...@perv.hal.COM> Gangrel De-Evolution: While its effect is permanent, it is not in play, so cannot be burned, even if the Methuselah playing it is ousted. [ quoted text not captured ]

Ken Mikolaj

[ quoted text not captured ] It is played on a specific Gangrel.

Mark Amidon

sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu (L. Scott Johnson) writes: >Date: 3 Sep 1995 17:30:53 GMT >jcl...@netcom.com (James C. Clover) writes: >>Don't you have to keep the Gangrel-D "on" the victim vampire? In that >>case, the golden rule applies. >>Otherwise, how are you supposed to remember whether or which Gangrel had >>sprouted a tail? >You simply remember. You may leave the card out to aid your memory, >but the Golden Rule of card ownership does not cause the effect to cease. >Reference: [deleted] Post-it Notes. This is good for titles (voted-in Princes or Justicars), Gangrels with a base of 2 hand damage (from Ritual Challenge), base 3 bleeds from Pulse of the Canaille, etc. It even works on that damned Nosferatu Putrescense. Mark Amidon, Nosferatu-in-training, Not putrid, just fresh from the Storm Sewer.