Aaron Connor#
I was led to believe that the only way around the do not replace clause
on Dragonbound was with VftC in effect when you played it.
Is this ruling below still valid or has there been an errata?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/browse_frm/thread/d3b62cb40c384706/8373ab8f2a67a589?q=visit+from+the+author:lsj#8373ab8f2a67a589
Thanks in advance,
Aaron
Archbishop
Adelaide
Visit from the Capuchin
Type: Master
Unique master.
Put this card into play with 4 counters on it. You get +X hand size,
where X is the number of counters on this card. Each time you would draw
to replace a card (not counting the card to replace the Visit), burn a
counter from this card instead. Burn this card if it has no counters.
Dragonbound
Type: Event
Gehenna. Do not replace as long as this card is in play.
During each Methuselah's discard phase, he or she burns X pool, where X
is the number of vampires in torpor he or she controls.