elu...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> Actually this brings up a question of mine. For Pentex Subversion,
> going on what you just said the D action to destroy it is made against
> the person who put it there? so they get a chance to block?
>
> The way some people played it before is that it was against the
> controller of the vampire. Thanks
>
> Michael =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCnzl?= <kue...@addcom.de> wrote:
> > If you put a minion card like Army of Rats in play (but not on a
> > vampire), you are the controller. And you are the controller of a
> > master card you play.
> >
> > But when you play a minion-card (equipment, retainer, Atonement,
> > MoD...) on a vampire, the controller of the minion card is the
> > controller of the vampire the card is played on. So your prey is the
> > controller of MoD.
Pentex Subversion, being a master card, is controlled by the Methuselah
who played it (since it has no card text to override that default).
If a minion controlled by someone else takes an action to burn a
Pentex Subversion you control, you may block. Rulebook [6.2.2.1]:
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/