[LSJ] Slave Q:

"If a member of the owning clan controlled by the Gargoyle's controller is blocked, the controller can tap the slave Gargoyle to cancel the combat and untap the acting vampire and have the slave Gargoyle enter combat with the blocking minion instead." Who is the acting minion in this instance, the untapped vampire or the tapped Gargoyle who is now entering combat? Roger

In message <9s125a$1035ea$1...@ID-104455.news.dfncis.de>, Roger Carhult [ quoted text not captured ] The acting vampire, since nothing has altered that. See also Malleable Visage, IIRC. -- James Coupe PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D EBD690ECD7A1F If I had a dick, I'd go get laid. We can do the B457CA213D7E6 next best thing. Let's kill people. Oh, not *you*. 68C3695D623D5D

"James Coupe" <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote in message news:C$NEUBvtP...@gratiano.zephyr.org.uk... > In message <9s125a$1035ea$1...@ID-104455.news.dfncis.de>, Roger Carhult > <rogc...@student.luth.se> writes: > >"If a member of the owning clan controlled by the Gargoyle's controller is > >blocked, the controller can tap the slave Gargoyle to cancel the combat and > >untap the acting vampire and have the slave Gargoyle enter combat with the > >blocking minion instead." > > > >Who is the acting minion in this instance, the untapped vampire or the > >tapped Gargoyle who is now entering combat? > > The acting vampire, since nothing has altered that. > > See also Malleable Visage, IIRC. Then Gargoyles are quite deadly agaisnt Obedience :) Roger

>>> Who is the acting minion in this instance, the untapped vampire or the >>> tapped Gargoyle who is now entering combat? >> >> The acting vampire, since nothing has altered that. >> >> See also Malleable Visage, IIRC. > > Then Gargoyles are quite deadly agaisnt Obedience :) This confused me a bit, but then I went and read the card: "Only usable when this reacting vampire is about to enter combat with an acting younger vampire." Koo. A way to enter combat with during your turn without acting. That IS quite deadly, and a sicko surprise for Lucian trying to block Sarah Cobbler. =) Ah, that pesky card text. =) -- Pat Ricochet Soul Jar'rn Fool of Atlanta

"Pat Ricochet" <sp...@socrates.gatech.edu> wrote in message news:B809B106.89E7%sp...@socrates.gatech.edu... [ quoted text not captured ] Yes there is, and I'm sure there's other cards "hosed" in this manner, I just haven't bothered to search for them. Have nayone else? Roger

James Coupe wrote: > > In message <9s125a$1035ea$1...@ID-104455.news.dfncis.de>, Roger Carhult > <rogc...@student.luth.se> writes: > >"If a member of the owning clan controlled by the Gargoyle's controller is > >blocked, the controller can tap the slave Gargoyle to cancel the combat and > >untap the acting vampire and have the slave Gargoyle enter combat with the > >blocking minion instead." > > > >Who is the acting minion in this instance, the untapped vampire or the > >tapped Gargoyle who is now entering combat? > > The acting vampire, since nothing has altered that. > > See also Malleable Visage, IIRC. Correct. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> a écrit dans le message news: 3BE49C7F...@white-wolf.com... > James Coupe wrote: > > > > In message <9s125a$1035ea$1...@ID-104455.news.dfncis.de>, Roger Carhult > > <rogc...@student.luth.se> writes: > > >"If a member of the owning clan controlled by the Gargoyle's controller is > > >blocked, the controller can tap the slave Gargoyle to cancel the combat and > > >untap the acting vampire and have the slave Gargoyle enter combat with the > > >blocking minion instead." > > > > > >Who is the acting minion in this instance, the untapped vampire or the > > >tapped Gargoyle who is now entering combat? > > > > The acting vampire, since nothing has altered that. > > > > See also Malleable Visage, IIRC. > > Correct. mmm... Is there a "window" to play obedience just before the gargoyle intervention ? reyda

"Reyda" <re...@noos.fr> wrote in message news:9s2vv8$f26$1...@neon.noos.net... [ quoted text not captured ] Shouldn't be since acting vampire comes first after reacting vampire blocks. Roger

Roger Carhult wrote: > "Reyda" <re...@noos.fr> wrote in message news:9s2vv8$f26$1...@neon.noos.net... > > mmm... Is there a "window" to play obedience just before the gargoyle > > intervention ? > > Shouldn't be since acting vampire comes first after reacting vampire blocks. Correct. [ quoted text not captured ]