On Oct 6, 8:22 pm, The Name Forgotten <tex...@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> On Oct 6, 8:19 pm, The Name Forgotten <tex...@telkomsa.net> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Oh, and I've searched this newsgroup and the White Wolf site and have
> found no evidence that the ruling on political struggle has changed
> either. Maybe you'll have better luck with your search?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Then again, I should have searched 'removed from game' and 'burnt' cos
then I would've picked this post up from LSJ:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/26dd253072a8c59f
On Mar 5, 5:37 pm, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote:
> adam.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Just curious, when a card in play is "removed from game" is that card
> > considered burned?
>
> No.
In light of this I'd like to ask LSJ to officially revoke that ruling
on Political Struggle (yes, I happen to know someone who plays it like
this) or clarify the above statement or Charigger.
Although, I must admit that the situation given above was a slightly
different one - in the sense that the person was asking if they could
play cards and treat a card that has been removed from the game as
burnt, rather than what I'm asking, in that a card that is removed
from the game is burnt as it is removed (but never actually enters the
ash-heap).