rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

2 Questions that I need help on

6 messages from 6 participants · 06 February 1995 – 08 February 1995
original thread on Google Groups

Todd Leistra

This recently came up in a game and after a long argument we worked out one type of ruling but I want to hear what the net has to say about it. The first question is on first strike. The situation is like this: Roxanne the malkavian has a flame-thrower and she attacked through a direct action Ricki the gangrel. Now comes the controversy. Ricki plays canine horde at superior which is supposed to destroy equipment at range with first strike (another side question is, is first strike before range is chosen?). Anyways, I want to play Read Intentions which gives Roxanne a "Dodge". This is not strike:Dodge but just "Dodge". So can I have Roxanne "Dodge" the canine horde or does the flame thrower go bye-bye? The second question is related to the first and it is: Is Read Intentions a Strike or just a "Dodge" but not a strike? So I would appreciate some answers either through email or posting. Thanx, Todd -- "So what if God is a lie? What would you do then?" "If it is necessary to choose between God and the truth I will always pick God." -Crimes and Misdemeanors

L. Scott Johnson

tlei...@ursa.calvin.edu (Todd Leistra) writes: > This recently came up in a game and after a long argument we >worked out one type of ruling but I want to hear what the net has to say >about it. The first question is on first strike. The situation is like >this: Roxanne the malkavian has a flame-thrower and she attacked through >a direct action Ricki the gangrel. Now comes the controversy. Ricki >plays canine horde at superior which is supposed to destroy equipment at >range with first strike (another side question is, is first strike before >range is chosen?). Anyways, I want to play Read Intentions which gives >Roxanne a "Dodge". This is not strike:Dodge but just "Dodge". So can I >have Roxanne "Dodge" the canine horde or does the flame thrower go bye-bye? > The second question is related to the first and it is: Is Read >Intentions a Strike or just a "Dodge" but not a strike? So I would >appreciate some answers either through email or posting. From the NetRep and Design Team RUllings 11/9/94: All dodges are strikes, even if the card forgot to say so. As Roxanne is the Acting Minion, her strike would be chosen first. Since she chose to use the Flame thrower, she cannot change her mind and dodge when Ricki announces Canine Horde as her strike. If she had announced the strike:Dodge, the dodge "negates the effect of the opponent's strike", as the rulebook says, so she would keep the flamethrower. (Section 15.3)

Larry Harriman

Todd Leistra (tlei...@ursa.calvin.edu) wrote: : This recently came up in a game and after a long argument we [ quoted text not captured ] All dodges are strike: dodges. They just forgot to write it in. In your example, Roxanne is the acting minion, so she would play strikes first. She'll probably strike with the flame thrower, and then, when the canine hordes come running, it's too let to go back and say "no, I want to dodge". Combat goes like this: 1)acting vamp's before range stuff. 2)blocking vamp's before range stuff. 3)acting vamp's manuevers. 4)blocking vamp's manuevers. 5)acting vamp's strike declaration. 6)blocing vamp's stike declaration. 7)first strike resolution ( both vamps ). 8)normal strike resolution ( both vamps ). 9)acting vamp's presses. 10)blocing vamp's presses. 11)repeat untill fully blended. Larrx...

Daniel Hoffman

In article <tleist24.792091351@ursa> tlei...@ursa.calvin.edu (Todd Leistra) writes: > This recently came up in a game and after a long argument we >worked out one type of ruling but I want to hear what the net has to say >about it. The first question is on first strike. The situation is like >this: Roxanne the malkavian has a flame-thrower and she attacked through >a direct action Ricki the gangrel. Now comes the controversy. Ricki >plays canine horde at superior which is supposed to destroy equipment at >range with first strike (another side question is, is first strike before >range is chosen?). Anyways, I want to play Read Intentions which gives >Roxanne a "Dodge". This is not strike:Dodge but just "Dodge". So can I >have Roxanne "Dodge" the canine horde or does the flame thrower go bye-bye? You can dodge first strike attacks. > The second question is related to the first and it is: Is Read >Intentions a Strike or just a "Dodge" but not a strike? So I would >appreciate some answers either through email or posting. All dodges are strikes, sucks doesn't it, makes Crusher's pay 1 pool for a dodge power go from good to nearly worthless.

Bob Ellison

> Roxanne the malkavian has a flame-thrower and she attacked through > a direct action Ricki the gangrel. Now comes the controversy. Ricki > plays canine horde at superior which is supposed to destroy equipment at > range with first strike (another side question is, is first strike before > range is chosen?). Anyways, I want to play Read Intentions which gives > Roxanne a "Dodge". This is not strike:Dodge but just "Dodge". So can I > have Roxanne "Dodge" the canine horde or does the flame thrower go bye-bye? Roxanne dodges. Someone else posted the effective order of strike resolution; it was very clear and understandable, so I'll reproduce it: - Combat Ends resolves first - Dodge resolves next - First Strike resolves next - normal strikes resolve last So Dodge resolves before the First Strike can have effect. (And no, range is chosen before any strikes. However, strikes that offer maneuvers can be played when choosing range, but the minion must then use the named strike, just as if the minion used the maneuver from a weapon.) > The second question is related to the first and it is: Is Read > Intentions a Strike or just a "Dodge" but not a strike? So I would > appreciate some answers either through email or posting. All Dodge cards are strikes. papillo the mendicant

Jeffrey Matthew Bergan

In article <Daniel.B.Hoffman...@nd.edu>, Daniel Hoffman <Daniel.B....@nd.edu> wrote: > >All dodges are strikes, sucks doesn't it, makes Crusher's pay 1 pool for a >dodge power go from good to nearly worthless. Oh I don't know about that. Picture a battle in which Crusher blocks someone who then procedes to announce some huge combination of aggravated damage, expecting Crusher not only to go to torpor, but to burn, since he happens to be semi-low on blood, and Crusher's Methusalah happens to be at a point when he doesn't have many cards (Happens often w/ celerity decks towards the end of the game), all he has to do is say, "Ok, I'll pay one blood and dodge..." Being able to avoid anything you need to is a _very_ nice ability. -Jeff Bergan jeff@leland