Anarch Revolt

Is Anarch Revolt cumulative? -- Michael Beer, Dortmund, Germany, ICQ 1175389 http://www.noefs.ping.de/user/mike/index.html -------------------------------------------- Life is founded on Chaos. So if you find your living room became disordered: Don't panic! It's natural... :)

Excerpts from netnews.rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad: 22-Jul-97 Anarch Revolt by Michael Be...@leila.ping. > Is Anarch Revolt cumulative? No. Redundant, but not cumulative. Just like Army of Rats. Take care, Jim

James A Ignatuk (igna...@andrew.cmu.edu) inscribed in fleeting electrons: : > Is Anarch Revolt cumulative? : : No. Redundant, but not cumulative. Just like Army of Rats. Incorrect. Anarch Revolt is cumulative. Dave G. -- Ohhh... Mmmhmmm... sweet, nourishing gruel...

James A Ignatuk <igna...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote in article <snpDpdm00...@andrew.cmu.edu>... > Excerpts from netnews.rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad: 22-Jul-97 Anarch > Revolt by Michael Be...@leila.ping. > > Is Anarch Revolt cumulative? > > No. Redundant, but not cumulative. Just like Army of Rats. > Actually, only Army of Rats has the "not cumulative" errata. Anarch Revolt does not have such errata, and it's generally played that it is cumulative. John Baker

James A Ignatuk wrote: > > Excerpts from netnews.rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad: 22-Jul-97 Anarch > Revolt by Michael Be...@leila.ping. > > Is Anarch Revolt cumulative? > > No. Redundant, but not cumulative. Just like Army of Rats. Anarch Revolts are cumulative. If ten are in play, then each Methuselah loses ten pool during her untap. (Army of Rats are not cumulative, as Mr. Ignatuk says) -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@regency.wizards.com) Official VtES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. (*) - Subject to review by Rules Team

Excerpts from netnews.rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad: 23-Jul-97 Re: Anarch Revolt by VtES R...@regency.wizards > Anarch Revolts are cumulative. If ten are in play, then each Methuselah > loses ten pool during her untap. > > (Army of Rats are not cumulative, as Mr. Ignatuk says) Sorry, I figured since Anarch Revolt is worded exactly as Army of Rats is (i.e. it says "lose 1 pool during untap" as opposed to "an additional pool"), then the ruling would be the same. My apologies for any confusion... Take care, Jim

In article <33D463...@leila.ping.de>, Michael Beer <Mi...@leila.ping.de> writes >Is Anarch Revolt cumulative? > Card Title: Anarch Revolt Pool: n/a Clan/Discip.: n/a Card Type: Master Card Text: Master Put this card in play. Each Methuselah burns 1 pool during his or her untap phase. Any vampire can burn this card with a successful vote; calling this vote is a +1 stealth action. Artist: Pete Venters Rarity: Uncommon Hmm, it's one of those awkward cards. I'd have to say yes, because since it would be cumulative with other cards eg Antediluvian Awakening, I see no reason why not with itself. -- James Coupe (remove .nospam to reply) Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see, one chants out between two worlds, `Fire walk with me`

James A Ignatuk wrote: > > Excerpts from netnews.rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad: 22-Jul-97 Anarch > Revolt by Michael Be...@leila.ping. > > Is Anarch Revolt cumulative? > > No. Redundant, but not cumulative. Just like Army of Rats. > > Take care, > Jim I'm afraid Anarch Revolts ARE cumulative.