Khetamon [LSJ/Lasombra]

In article <39B47CC1...@hotmail.com>, Chris Shorb <ultima...@hotmail.com> writes >Should all Banishment rulings also apply to Peace of Khetamon? Since it uses the same mechanism, expressed the same way, yes, I'd use them. >And PS, is The Lasombra taking over/filling in for LSJ? Or just being >helpful while LSJ takes care of important expansion business... Officially, no-one has taken over for LSJ. Generally, people like Lasombra, Derek and myself answer whatever questions we can when LSJ is unavailable, but none of us are more "official" than any of the others. (That is, we are all unofficial, even though most of the time, we're right.) -- James Coupe | PGP Key 0x5D623D5D | ja...@zephyr.org.uk (New e-mail) "Who'd have ever predicted the moment would come when I find myself grateful they've kept women dumb? She's an innocent maiden but then so am I, that's why it's possible I could get by."

James Coupe <ve...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote in message news:L1nBF4AZ...@obeah.demon.co.uk... > In article <39B47CC1...@hotmail.com>, Chris Shorb > <ultima...@hotmail.com> writes > >Should all Banishment rulings also apply to Peace of Khetamon? > > Since it uses the same mechanism, expressed the same way, yes, I'd use > them. > > >And PS, is The Lasombra taking over/filling in for LSJ? Or just being > >helpful while LSJ takes care of important expansion business... > > Officially, no-one has taken over for LSJ. > > Generally, people like Lasombra, Derek and myself answer whatever > questions we can when LSJ is unavailable, but none of us are more > "official" than any of the others. (That is, we are all unofficial, > even though most of the time, we're right.) > Ever humble, that's our James. Mark Shanewood who has never been "official" in his life (well, there was that one time....)

Chris Shorb <ultima...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Should all Banishment rulings also apply to Peace of Khetamon? Yes. (Except for the one about "from the active region"). > And PS, is The Lasombra taking over/filling in for LSJ? Or just being > helpful while LSJ takes care of important expansion business... Several netizens have taken to answering questions posted here. If the answers are correct and the original poster didn't indicate that an official response was needed, then I tend not to follow up with a verification post. This was true before the expansion business. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:8p5dht$a3j$1...@nnrp1.deja.com... > Chris Shorb <ultima...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Should all Banishment rulings also apply to Peace of Khetamon? > > Yes. > (Except for the one about "from the active region"). > > > And PS, is The Lasombra taking over/filling in for LSJ? Or just being > > helpful while LSJ takes care of important expansion business... > > Several netizens have taken to answering questions posted here. > If the answers are correct and the original poster didn't indicate > that an official response was needed, then I tend not to follow > up with a verification post. > > This was true before the expansion business. > > -- But if a Lasombra Clan Impersonates to LSJ, is he still Independent....? *ducking and running*

In article <39b6d517$0$72524$7f89...@newsreader.visi.com>, "Mark & Kathy ShaneWood" <shan...@tcinternet.net> wrote: > > LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message > news:8p5dht$a3j$1...@nnrp1.deja.com... > > Chris Shorb <ultima...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Should all Banishment rulings also apply to Peace of Khetamon? > > > > Yes. > > (Except for the one about "from the active region"). Hi. This may seem a bit unrelated but I was wondering : is it just me or is "Peace of Khetamon" just a worse version of "Banishment" ? Jan-Christophe Hoogendoorn. [ quoted text not captured ]

In article <8p7tln$8d8$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Jan-Christophe.Hoogendoorn@sup elec.fr writes >Hi. This may seem a bit unrelated but I was wondering : is it just me >or is "Peace of Khetamon" just a worse version of "Banishment" ? Yes. However, people may be more inclined *not* to block Peace of Khetamon if they know it can't affect them when you, for instance, have a weenie in torpor and would prefer to spend pool bringing him out, rather than rescuing him (too little blood on your vamps, say). [ quoted text not captured ]

Ok I think I catch you drift. Seems really twisted though. Ever really used it that way ?? Jan-Chistophe Hoogendoorn, the Batavian Brujah. (I can't beliiieeeve I'm using nickname :)). Soon I'll be ending my posts with quotes too !! Tsssss ...) James Coupe a écrit dans le message ... [ quoted text not captured ]

In article <8p8ok3$9bs$1...@news.univ-metz.fr>, Jan-Christophe Hoogendoorn <Jan-Christoph...@supelec.fr> writes >Ok I think I catch you drift. Seems really twisted though. Ever really used >it that way ?? I've known a number of people toy with the idea of using it in that way and there, it probably is better than Banishment because people can't get paranoid about what you're going to do with it (Cryptic Rider and the Presence blood and pool gain card excepted). [ quoted text not captured ]