Rule on card combo

I was wondering if this card combo is legal: I play "Galgonda Inner Peace" on one of my vampires with superior Vicissitude and burn him, Gaining the blood he is worth. Can this Vampire play "Reform Body" as a reaction to the burning , or is there a rule against playing reaction card against master cards?

Chris Meland wrote: > > I was wondering if this card combo is legal: > I play "Galgonda Inner Peace" on one of my vampires with superior > Vicissitude and burn him, ... and remove him from the game, actually. He's not "burned". > Gaining the blood he is worth. > Can this Vampire play "Reform Body" as a reaction to the burning , or > is there a rule against playing reaction card against master cards? Well, you can't do it becuase he's not being burned *and* because there's no action to react to nor combat - so Reform Body couldn't be played even if he were being burned. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:3BE6A141...@white-wolf.com... > Chris Meland wrote: > > > > I was wondering if this card combo is legal: > > I play "Galgonda Inner Peace" on one of my vampires with superior > > Vicissitude and burn him, > > ... and remove him from the game, actually. He's not "burned". > > > Gaining the blood he is worth. > > Can this Vampire play "Reform Body" as a reaction to the burning , or > > is there a rule against playing reaction card against master cards? > > Well, you can't do it becuase he's not being burned *and* because > there's no action to react to nor combat - so Reform Body couldn't > be played even if he were being burned. And you also cannot play reactioncards in your own turn. Roger

Roger Carhult wrote: > And you also cannot play reactioncards in your own turn. Not true. [1.6.3.5] [ quoted text not captured ]

LSJ wrote: > Roger Carhult wrote: > > And you also cannot play reactioncards in your own turn. > > Not true. [1.6.3.5] > I also guess that you could do some very peculiar things with reactioncards if you're acting against your own minions with the help of Madness Network during someone elses turn. Sten During -- NetGuide Scandinavia AB http://www.netg.se/ Tankegangen 4 in...@netg.se 417 56 Goteborg Phone:+46 - (0)31 - 50 79 45 Sweden Fax: +46 - (0)31 - 50 79 39

Sten During wrote: > > LSJ wrote: > > > Roger Carhult wrote: > > > And you also cannot play reactioncards in your own turn. > > > > Not true. [1.6.3.5] > > > > I also guess that you could do some very peculiar things with > reactioncards if you're acting against your own minions > with the help of Madness Network during someone elses > turn. No. [1.6.3.5] [ quoted text not captured ]

LSJ wrote: > > > I also guess that you could do some very peculiar things with > > reactioncards if you're acting against your own minions > > with the help of Madness Network during someone elses > > turn. > > No. [1.6.3.5] > > Ah, should have seen that. By the way, 'one of a Methuselah's minions' should be read as 'a minion currently controlled by a Metuselah' I guess, in order to avoid being unable to react against minions 'borrowed' by another Metuselah, or the other way around. [ quoted text not captured ]

Sten During wrote: > [Re: 1.6.3.5] By the way, 'one of a Methuselah's minions' > should be read as 'a minion currently controlled by a Metuselah' I guess, > in order to avoid being unable to react against minions 'borrowed' by > another Metuselah, or the other way around. Yes. Control is the only thing that defines "possession" of a minion, and the apostrophe 's' is the possessive. [ quoted text not captured ]

I was wondering if this card combo is legal: I play "Galgonda Inner Peace" on one of my vampires with superior Vicissitude and burn him, [ quoted text not captured ]

[ quoted text not captured ] When using Google to read messages, you should note Google's specified delay in the appearance of new articles/messages in the archive (somewhere around 9 hours, I believe). [ quoted text not captured ]