rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Repulsion Q:

4 messages from 3 participants · 16 January 2002 – 17 January 2002
original thread on Google Groups

Roger Carhult

You're allowed to play out Repulsion at superior without needing the stealth, right? Roger

LSJ

Roger Carhult wrote: > > You're allowed to play out Repulsion at superior without needing the > stealth, right? No. Can't add stealth unless you need it. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Matt

LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:<3C45DA7D...@white-wolf.com>... > Roger Carhult wrote: > > > > You're allowed to play out Repulsion at superior without needing the > > stealth, right? > > No. Can't add stealth unless you need it. So thats a reversal of this ruling? http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=3C1A2C3D.593718B6%40white-wolf.com Joshua Duffin wrote: > > At OBE, Repulsion says "Put this card on this vampire. > This vampire gets +1 stealth. Burn this card if this > vampire goes to torpor. This vampire cannot have or > play another Repulsion." > > Is this playable when you don't currently need stealth? Yes. > I could see an argument in favor of it being playable > since the first sentence is "Put this card on this vampire", > and only after the card's on the vampire do you get the > stealth bonus. But on the other hand, it is a card that > provides stealth, and normally you can only play those when > you need the stealth. See also Sport Bike. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: Wisefool Mercuriel

LSJ

Matt wrote: > > LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:<3C45DA7D...@white-wolf.com>... > > Roger Carhult wrote: > > > > > > You're allowed to play out Repulsion at superior without needing the > > > stealth, right? > > > > No. Can't add stealth unless you need it. > > So thats a reversal of this ruling? Uh, it would yes. But actually I just wasn't reading the card closely enough. No reversal - the answer should've been "yes", as you cite below. Thanks for the catch. > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=3C1A2C3D.593718B6%40white-wolf.com > > Joshua Duffin wrote: > > > > At OBE, Repulsion says "Put this card on this vampire. > > This vampire gets +1 stealth. Burn this card if this > > vampire goes to torpor. This vampire cannot have or > > play another Repulsion." > > > > Is this playable when you don't currently need stealth? > > Yes. > > > I could see an argument in favor of it being playable > > since the first sentence is "Put this card on this vampire", > > and only after the card's on the vampire do you get the > > stealth bonus. But on the other hand, it is a card that > > provides stealth, and normally you can only play those when > > you need the stealth. > > See also Sport Bike. > > -- > LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. > Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: > > Wisefool > Mercuriel -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/