[LSJ] Force of Will vs Ashes to Ashes

So I'm a George Fredrick. I go to Force of Will at superior (so I'm taking a point of aggro at the end of the action). I get blocked, and in the ensuing combat, I play Ashes to Ashes at superior, untapping me, giving me 2 blood, and sending me to torpor. Combat ends, and I still have to take the 1 point of aggro from the FoW: A) I assume I have to burn one blood for it to avoid destruction, 'cause the AtA sending me to torpor is essentially "wounding" me, correct? B) If I don't have the blood to burn ('cause I played AtA at, um, inferior?), and have zero blood, and am going to torpor due to the AtA already, does the point of aggro from FoW burn me? Thanks, -Peter

<pd...@lightlink.com> wrote in message news:1106063154.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > So I'm a George Fredrick. I go to Force of Will at superior (so I'm > taking a point of aggro at the end of the action). I get blocked, and > in the ensuing combat, I play Ashes to Ashes at superior, untapping me, > giving me 2 blood, and sending me to torpor. Combat ends, and I still > have to take the 1 point of aggro from the FoW: > > A) I assume I have to burn one blood for it to avoid destruction, > 'cause the AtA sending me to torpor is essentially "wounding" me, > correct? Yes. > B) If I don't have the blood to burn ('cause I played AtA at, um, > inferior?), and have zero blood, and am going to torpor due to the AtA > already, does the point of aggro from FoW burn me? Yes the burnt blood above is blood burned to prevent destruction. If you don't prevent destruction, ... -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. V:TES homepage: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ Though effective, appear to be ineffective -- Sun Tzu