Janne Hägglund#
Scenario A:
My prey has a vampire with Secure Haven.
I hunt (an undirected action) with a minion that has superior Valeren.
My predator blocks, and combat occurs.
I strike with superior Blissful Agony, and send my opponent to fight the
vampire with Secure Haven.
Is this legal? I'd say it is - no (D) action has been taken.
Scenario B:
My prey has a vampire with Secure Haven, as before.
I rush my predator (a directed action), strike with superior Blissful Agony,
and send my opponent to fight the vamp with Secure Haven.
Now, is this legal? Is Blissful Agony's new combat a part of my (D) action?
Relevant card texts:
Secure Haven [DS:C2, FN:PS, CE:PM, Anarchs:PAB]
Cardtype: Master
Cost: 1 pool
Master: unique location. Haven.
Put this card on a minion you control. This minion cannot be affected by (D)
actions. Any Methuselah burns an additional pool when playing master cards on
(or that target) this minion. Burn this card if this minion enters torpor. A
minion can have only one haven.
Blissful Agony [BL:R1, LoB:R]
Cardtype: Combat
Cost: 1 blood
Discipline: Valeren/Animalism
[ani] Strike: make a hand strike at +1 damage.
[val] Only usable at close range before strikes are chosen. Opposing minion
takes 1 unpreventable damage during strike resolution each round this combat
when the range is close. A vampire may play only one Blissful Agony at [val]
each combat.
[VAL] Strike: combat ends. Choose a minion controlled by a Methuselah other
than the opposing vampire's controller. The opposing vampire enters combat
with that minion.
--
hg@ "If you can't offend part of your audience,
iki.fi there is no point in being an artist at all." -Hakim Bey