Nick M#
Hey All, I usually run 2 round tournaments using Round 1 and Round 3
of the Optimal Seating chart included in The Archon.
Realising that this was not 'optimal' I modified the numbers slightly,
guided by the Optimal Seating Criteria -
http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/2552391564fe2108
A formatted spreadsheet can be viewed here:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AomnGn_6A3O3dF9lZ3VUSE1vTkYwbzRNckdhLV9wWFE&hl=en
A poorly formatted text version follows with comments on any criteria
violations (mainly the number of starting transfers for each player).
The results are not perfect, particularly the 9 player, but should be
usable. Comments?
Nick
(8 Players)
R1 1,2,3,4 5,6,7,8
R2 7,4,2,5 3,8,6,1
Starting transfers are not equitably distributed (5,5,4,6 5,5,4,6)
(9 Players)
R1 1,2,3,4,5 6,7,8,9
R2 9,3,1,8,7 5,4,2,6
Available VPs are not equitably distributed for 3 players (1,3,6)
Starting transfers are not equitably distributed (3,5,5,6,5 5,6,7,5)
(10 Players)
R1 1,2,3,4,5 6,7,8,9,10
R2 4,10,7,3,1 9,5,2,8,6
Starting transfers are not equitably distributed (5,5,7,5,6 5,5,7,5,6)
(12 Players)
R1 1,2,3,4 5,6,7,8 9,10,11,12
R2 12,11,6,1 8,3,10,5 7,4,2,9
Starting transfers are not equitably distributed (5,5,5,6 5,5,4,5
5,5,5,5)
(13 Players)
R1 1,2,3,4,5 6,7,8,9 10,11,12,13
R2 11,4,7,10,6 13,8,2,1 5,12,9,3
Starting transfers are not equitably distributed (5,5,7,6,5 5,5,5,7
5,3,5,5)
(14 Players)
R1 1,2,3,4,5 6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13,14
R2 10,4,11,13,6 14,8,2,1,12 7,9,5,3
Starting transfers are not equitably distributed (5,5,7,6,7 5,3,5,6,5
4,6,7,5)
(15 Players)
R1 1,2,3,4,5 6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13,14,15
R2 14,8,10,2,11 4,13,15,7,1 9,3,5,12,6
Starting transfers are not equitably distributed (5,6,5,5,7 5,6,5,5,7
5,6,5,5,7)