Halcyan 2 wrote:
>
> >In the Gargoyles preveiw this Q and A is given:
> >Q: If a slave Gargoyle creates an Embrace, what is the new vampire?
> >A: An Indepedent (non-slave) Gargoyle. Explicit card text is needed
> >for a Gargoyle to be a slave.
> > Ok, but why is the Embrace independent? Is the answer "because it
> >says so"?
>
> Because it was determined that the default sect of the Gargoyle clan is
> Independent. (Just as the Daughters and Nagaraja are Independent but the
> Harbringers are Sabbat). So an Embrace has the sect affiliation its clan would
> normally have. (A Tzimisce with a Writ that Embraces still ends up with a
> Sabbat Tzimisce Embrace).
Correct. The preview page notes that Gargoyle, the clan, is "independent".
An Embrace is the same clan as his sire, and belongs to the default sect
of that clan.
> >My confusion comes from the text on Saxon, Master of the
> >Slaves: "Camarilla Tremere Slave". Is Saxon a Camarilla vampire, or
> >is he just a Slave of the "Camarilla Tremere" (a phrase that seems a
> >bit redundant)?
>
> I think the Camarilla part is Saxon's sect-affiliation (as you said, it would
> be redundant otherwise). And he's also a Camarilla Slave.
... also a Tremere Slave, that is.
> >If Saxon is Cam. then why would his Embraces be
> >Independent?
>
> Just like how Lucita's Embraces are Sabbat Lasombra, Samat's Embraces are
> Independent Followers of Set, and Anka's Embraces are Independent Ravnos. The
> Embraces do not automatically inherit any special text or traits of their
> "sires" (such as special sect affiliation).
Correct.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/