L. Scott Johnson#
bta...@bernard.ma.utexas.edu (Brian Tandy) writes:
>Suppose someone bleed you and you attempt to block with an untapped vampire.
>They respond with that obfuscate card which at superior taps anyone trying
>to block and adds stealth. Can you then deflect using the vampire that
>first attempted to block (presumably it is now tapped)?
Yes, you may continue to have the would-be blocker play (further) reaction
cards. If you couldn't the would-be blocker would be denied the
ability to boost his intercept in response to Faceless Night (superior).
The official word (in response to my observation that a tapped vampire
can't play reaction cards) is that the blocker doesn't become tapped until
it has been determined whether they've successfully blocked the action or
not. So, you could deflect the bleed before removing the would-be blocker
from his block attempt (since other reaction cards are not denied at that
time).
--
L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | All generalizations are false.
http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson |
Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger. |