Yet another silly question (this time Weather Control)

Hi all, I have and idea of weenie THA rush. Recently I assembled a quick deck, and it was so good in our gaming group (I played with Ravnos equipment stealers and Malkavian CEL OBF AUS gun weilers). Anyways, I would like to ask you a question. How much damage Weather Control at superior deals? 1 or 2? Since card text says: "[...] amount of damage inflicted increases by 1 each round." I assume it is 2 damage. Bu tI could be wrong. If that would be 1 dmg 1st round, 2 dmg 2nd round would the text sound like that: "each subsequent round..."? Regards, G.

[ quoted text not captured ] Card text is quite clear : firts round = 1 damage, second round " 2 damage, third round = 3 damage and so on... =)

> Card text is quite clear : firts round = 1 damage, second round " 2 damage, > third round = 3 damage and so on... =) Not for me :). Is first round of combat a round of combat or no?. WC text says nothing like "each subsequent round", but "each round", which implies even the first round. Or is my knowledge of English still poor? Thanks for help, Gurus.

[ quoted text not captured ] 1 on the first round, 2 on the second, and so on. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

jimm...@go2.pl (Guru) wrote in message news:<b42959b5.02090...@posting.google.com>... [ quoted text not captured ] Look at it this way...the superior provides an increase each round over the last...as there was no previous round on the first round, you start at 1 and add 1 for each round thereafter. 'subsequent round' would certainly be clearer, but the end result is the same, you cannot have an 'increase' in the first round when you have not yet played something to be the basis to add to. T

> Look at it this way...the superior provides an increase each round > over the last...as there was no previous round on the first round, you > start at 1 and add 1 for each round thereafter. 'subsequent round' > would certainly be clearer, but the end result is the same, you cannot > have an 'increase' in the first round when you have not yet played > something to be the basis to add to. Hmm..., yes, that explanation suits me. Thanks a lot. I know I am nitpicking wording of cards, but I really sometimes do not understand. Regards, Gurus.