LSJ: Sabbat Rules Sheet

As I understood it, apart from the Withdrawl rules on the Sabbat sheet (which are strictly optional), the rest of the rules were in force - being Primogen or Princes etc. Now, I've been away from my cards for a while and having to moderate a JOL game. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any mention of the Sabbat rules changes on the Rulesmonger site (the version at deckserver.net). Are these rules changes official and archived on the web somewhere, as it would be most helpful if they were. Or is the deckserver.net mirror simply a little (lot) out of date? -- James Coupe (Prince of Mercia) Change nospam to obeah to reply Vampire: Elder Kindred Network http://madnessnetwork.hexagon.net

James Coupe <ve...@obeah.demon.co.uk> wrote: > As I understood it, apart from the Withdrawl rules on the Sabbat sheet > (which are strictly optional), the rest of the rules were in force - > being Primogen or Princes etc. The vote-replinishement rule is also not in force. > Now, I've been away from my cards for a while and having to moderate a > JOL game. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any mention of the Sabbat > rules changes on the Rulesmonger site (the version at deckserver.net). The Sabbat Rulesheet is part of the VTES rules canon. The rules that are in the VTES rulebook and/or the Sabbat rulesheet are not duplicated in the rulings/errata lists, no. The rulings/errata lists are for things that are not in the rules. > Are these rules changes official and archived on the web somewhere, as > it would be most helpful if they were. Or is the deckserver.net mirror > simply a little (lot) out of date? The sabbat sheet is available from the WotC web page in PDF. http://www.wizards.com/VTES/Sabbat_Rulebook.pdf -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) VTES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. Searchable database of official card text, errata, and rulings: http://deckserver.net/cgi-deckserver/rulemonger.cgi/powersearch -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum

In article <6sjfq9$dca$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, LSJ <vte...@wizards.com> writes >James Coupe <ve...@obeah.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> As I understood it, apart from the Withdrawl rules on the Sabbat sheet >> (which are strictly optional), the rest of the rules were in force - >> being Primogen or Princes etc. > >The vote-replinishement rule is also not in force. Now that we have NVP as an official rule, what *is* the stance on replacing votes in tournaments? Are they now just replaced at the end of the vote but you only have one card to replace anyway (barring other modifiers), so it doesn't matter towards cycling etc.? [ quoted text not captured ]

James Coupe <ve...@obeah.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Now that we have NVP as an official rule, what *is* the stance on > replacing votes in tournaments? Are they now just replaced at the end > of the vote but you only have one card to replace anyway (barring other > modifiers), so it doesn't matter towards cycling etc.? No cards are replaced during a political action (referendum) - this includes modifiers and reactions as well as poltical action cards burned during the referendum. This has always been the rule, and it is still in effect. The DCI delayed vote replinishment rule (do not replace burned PAs until the end of the uurn) is no longer part of the official DCI rules - see the new rules linked from the WotC web page: www.wizards.com/VTES [ quoted text not captured ]