Hi!
If there's a card wich is very contested in my neighbourhood, it's this
card. Those are my questions...
1. It says on the card that you have to use this card when the vampire
has more hand damage than the other vampire, and then PULLED FANGS
inflics 1 aggravated damage. Does the other vampire receives 2 normal
damages and 1 aggravated damage or just 1 aggravated?
2. It also says on the card explications when the vampire goes in
torpor. I can't use my fortitude cards to prevent the damage made
by Pulled Fangs and not go in torpor?
3. If I can prevent the agravated damage made by Pulled Fangs, Am I still
stuck with the card Pulled Fangs on the vampire?
Thanks in advance... And by the way. I'm a french Canadian (Montreal,
in the province of Quebec) so I hope my english isn't bad enough to not be
understandable.
Martin Filion
Montreal, Qb (Canada)
Martin Filion <mordillo@vircom.com> wrote:
>1. It says on the card that you have to use this card when the vampire
> has more hand damage than the other vampire, and then PULLED FANGS
> inflics 1 aggravated damage. Does the other vampire receives 2 normal
> damages and 1 aggravated damage or just 1 aggravated?
Actually, which vampire has more hand damage doesn't matter per se; what
matters is who inflicted more damage. So if Badger gets bonked upside
the head by Bianca but prevents both points of damage, then (assuming
Biance can't prevent the damage from Badger) Badger will be able to use
Pulled Fangs. Even though Bianca's hand damage is higher, Badger inflicted
more damage in this case.
The aggravated damage from pulled fangs is in addition to the damage
inflicted earlier in the round. Note that the damage is essentially useless
if the vampire had been sent to torpor anyway.
>2. It also says on the card explications when the vampire goes in
> torpor. I can't use my fortitude cards to prevent the damage made
> by Pulled Fangs and not go in torpor?
If a Fortitude says it prevents damage from strikes, then it may not
be used against the Pulled Fangs damage. If it just says it prevents
damage, then it can be used. Skin of Rock could be used, but Skin of
Steel would be ineffective.
>3. If I can prevent the agravated damage made by Pulled Fangs, Am I still
> stuck with the card Pulled Fangs on the vampire?
Am pretty sure Pulled Fangs doesn't care whether the damage is
prevented, but I'll check that.
Tom Wylie rec.games.deckmaster Network Representative for
aahz@hal.com Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
Before I could do anything to stop it, Tom Wylie wrote:
> >1. It says on the card that you have to use this card when the vampire
> > has more hand damage than the other vampire, and then PULLED FANGS
> > inflics 1 aggravated damage. Does the other vampire receives 2 normal
> > damages and 1 aggravated damage or just 1 aggravated?
It actully just says, "Usable by a minion who inflicts more damage at
close range than the victim vampire."
I had a guy use Pulled Fangs on my last night after using Blur for some
additional strikes. He counted the additional strikes cumulatively as his
damage, and I questioned whether or not that works. I let him burn my
vamp, but I thought it stank. So what's the word? Do additional strikes
mean the vampire does more damage at close range? Or is it based on the
single-strike amount?
Thanks...
Brian
--
If he were opened, and you find so much blood in his | a-Henh!
liver as will clog the foot of a flea, I'll eat the | Brian Wilson
rest of the anatomy. |
William Shakespeare |
Brian Wilson <bwilson@gate.net> wrote:
>I had a guy use Pulled Fangs on my last night after using Blur for some
>additional strikes. He counted the additional strikes cumulatively as his
>damage, and I questioned whether or not that works. I let him burn my
>vamp, but I thought it stank. So what's the word?...
Works just fine.
Tom Wylie rec.games.deckmaster Network Representative for
aahz@hal.com Wizards of the Coast, Inc.