rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Additional strikes are doing my head in.

3 messages from 2 participants · 11 January 2001
original thread on Google Groups

hamd...@my-deja.com

With the advent of the !Brujah precon, there has been a spate of celerity / potence decks cropping up (to my dismay). With celerity comes additional strikes, and with additional strikes come trouble... 1) Does Jackos additional strike count towards his additional strikes on the round - i.e. can he still play a Blur after he has had his additional strike. I think no. 2) Same as the above for Sword of Bloody Judgement. I also think no. DH Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

LSJ

hamd...@my-deja.com wrote: > 1) Does Jackos additional strike count towards his additional strikes > on the round - i.e. can he still play a Blur after he has had his > additional strike. I think no. His card text indicates "yes". > 2) Same as the above for [Sword of Judgment]. I also think no. Correct, since the rules regarding gaining additional strikes are not overridden by card text. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ [ quoted text not captured ]

hamd...@my-deja.com

In article <93kbj9$un4$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > hamd...@my-deja.com wrote: > > 1) Does Jackos additional strike count towards his additional strikes > > on the round - i.e. can he still play a Blur after he has had his > > additional strike. I think no. > > His card text indicates "yes". Ooops! Yes, that's pretty obvious, isn't it! Sorry. > > 2) Same as the above for [Sword of Judgment]. I also think no. > > Correct, since the rules regarding gaining additional strikes > are not overridden by card text. Cool. Thanks DH [ quoted text not captured ]