rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

New Fame ruling from FAQ

5 messages from 4 participants · 14 April 1995 – 25 April 1995
original thread on Google Groups

James W. Rouse III

I don't get the new Fame ruling in the just released FAQ. It has two provisos, one of which makes the other moot. It reads: Fame is considered unique. Multiple Fames are not cumulative. What gives? If it's unique, how could it possibly be cumulative? YARTI (Yet another ruling to ignore)

Thomas R Wylie

James W. Rouse III <jro...@clark.net> wrote: >Fame is considered unique. Multiple Fames are not cumulative. >What gives? If it's unique, how could it possibly be cumulative? When we were going over the answer we decided it would be fairly obvious that it should be read as "Fame is considered unique and therefore multiple Fames are not cumulative (but contested)." Based on feedback this was a bad assumption, so the answer will be clarified. Tom Wylie rec.games.trading-cards.* Network Representative for aa...@cats.ucsc.edu Wizards of the Coast, Inc.

James R. McClure Jr.

aa...@cats.ucsc.edu (Thomas R Wylie) wrote: > James W. Rouse III <jro...@clark.net> wrote: > >Fame is considered unique. Multiple Fames are not cumulative. > >What gives? If it's unique, how could it possibly be cumulative? > > When we were going over the answer we decided it would be fairly obvious > that it should be read as "Fame is considered unique and therefore multiple > Fames are not cumulative (but contested)." Based on feedback this was a > bad assumption, so the answer will be clarified. Peace Thomas, Seemed pretty clear to me. "Unique" is clearly defined in the rules. Nil carborundum illigitimi, James R. McClure Jr. The OS/2 Apostle <insert disclaimer here>

Owen Reynolds

>> >Fame is considered unique. Multiple Fames are not cumulative. >> >What gives? If it's unique, how could it possibly be cumulative? >> >> When we were going over the answer we decided it would be fairly obvious >> that it should be read as "Fame is considered unique and therefore multiple >> Fames are not cumulative (but contested)." Based on feedback this was a >> bad assumption, so the answer will be clarified. >Seemed pretty clear to me. "Unique" is clearly defined in the rules. The reason it's unclear is that the ruling describes what happens when you have multiple copies of Fame in play--apparently this says that when 2 famous vampires are in torpor everyone still only loses 1 blood/ turn (of course, it doesn't really mean to say that.) This implicitly says that you _can_ have multiple Fames in play. That's why it's confusing. If they issued a ruling saying that only 1 Mob Connections could be used to continue a given combat, wouldn't you be a little puzzled?

Thomas R Wylie

Yes, the first entry for Fame was confusing, which is why we took it out during when we did the quick twiddle of the FAQ. It is considered unique, so obviously the effect can't be cumulative. [ quoted text not captured ]