[LSJ] I want to clarify the decline block subject once and for all

Up to now i understand the rules as follows (correct me if i am wrong): The following things are legal things to do (correct me if i am wrong): 1. meth A announces a bleed action, prey declines to block, the meth bleeding asks all meths if they block, they all decline, plays conditioning and now none has the option to block even with eagle sight (not even Anneke due to the new errata). 2. meth A announces a bleed action, prey anounces block attempt, meth A in order to draw some stealth plays a conditioning, draws a lost in crowds and plays it, then a meth with eagle sight announces a block attempt and blocks with a domain. 3. Anneke can no longer block whenever she want, e.g. meth A bleeds, all decline to block, plays a condtitioning, the meth being bled cannot reduce and he is being ousted, Anneke cannot block at this point due to the new errata. 4. Anneke's ability (according to the new errata) is completely identical to eagle sight sup., right ? George

"Jyhad_addict" <geo...@for.auth.gr> wrote in message news:c6a50f81.04120...@posting.google.com... > Up to now i understand the rules as follows (correct me if i am > wrong): > > The following things are legal things to do (correct me if i am > wrong): > > 1. meth A announces a bleed action, prey declines to block, the meth > bleeding asks all meths if they block, they all decline, plays > conditioning and now none has the option to block even with eagle > sight (not even Anneke due to the new errata). Correct. (Anneke due to new printing). Previously Anneke could still have been "defeated" by asking for Anneke's block after all other players. Once she declines, she's done as well. > 2. meth A announces a bleed action, prey anounces block attempt, meth > A in order to draw some stealth plays a conditioning, draws a lost in > crowds and plays it, then a meth with eagle sight announces a block > attempt and blocks with a domain. OK. > 3. Anneke can no longer block whenever she want, e.g. meth A bleeds, > all decline to block, plays a condtitioning, the meth being bled > cannot reduce and he is being ousted, Anneke cannot block at this > point due to the new errata. New printing, correct. Previously she could have been defeated by asking for her block prior to the Conditioning. > 4. Anneke's ability (according to the new errata) is completely > identical to eagle sight sup., right ? It is not cancelable by DI or such, but otherwise, sure. :-) -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. V:TES homepage: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ Though effective, appear to be ineffective -- Sun Tzu

> > 4. Anneke's ability (according to the new errata) is completely > > identical to eagle sight sup., right ? > > It is not cancelable by DI or such, but otherwise, sure. :-) There is always Seeds of Corruption :-)) -- johannes walch

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:<31b9a8F...@individual.net>... > "Jyhad_addict" <geo...@for.auth.gr> wrote in message > news:c6a50f81.04120...@posting.google.com... > > Up to now i understand the rules as follows (correct me if i am > > wrong): > > > > The following things are legal things to do (correct me if i am > > wrong): > > > > 1. meth A announces a bleed action, prey declines to block, the meth > > bleeding asks all meths if they block, they all decline, plays > > conditioning and now none has the option to block even with eagle > > sight (not even Anneke due to the new errata). > > Correct. > (Anneke due to new printing). > > Previously Anneke could still have been "defeated" by asking for > Anneke's block after all other players. Once she declines, she's > done as well. > what's if i'm the grandpredator (and i'm not the prey) of the math who the acting minions it's bleeding and when that math. askme if i attempt to block i say... maybe yes, later... i have to answer yes or no about the decline of block???? why??? it's have sense that???? imho it's ilogical... i don't have to answer a question of about decline or not a block of a (D) who it's not to me... (because i don't have with normal rule of blocking... only with ability and cards) [ quoted text not captured ]

In message <cafbc9c8.04120...@posting.google.com>, Enrique San Mart?n <es...@chile.com> writes: >what's if i'm the grandpredator (and i'm not the prey) of the math who >the acting minions it's bleeding and when that math. askme if i >attempt to block i say... maybe yes, later... i have to answer yes or >no about the decline of block???? Yes. The acting Methuselah gets to order what happens, when. When he asks for blocks (and goes round for all blocks), you have to answer yay or nay. >why??? it's have sense that???? imho >it's ilogical... i don't have to answer a question of about decline or >not a block of a (D) who it's not to me... If you're asked (either specifically, or in general "Anyone doing funky Eagle's Sight style stuff?" then yes, you have to answer. -- James Coupe PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D Who's ever heard of that, though! EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 Designing a deck that just calls votes. 13D7E668C3695D623D5D That's crazy talk, there.