rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Bribes and ousting LSJ

4 messages from 4 participants · 23 April 2010
original thread on Google Groups

librarian

What if you call a vote that will oust someone (Meth a calls KRC, Meth B has 3 pool left), and then put out a bribes. If Meth B votes for it, I assume they are not ousted, because they will receive the pool for bribes "when the results ... are tallied", and then take the 3 pool damage. Right? or Wrong? best - chris Bribes [Jyhad:C, VTES:C, Sabbat:C, SW:C/PV2, CE:PTo2/PV2, Anarchs:PAB4, KMW:PAn3/PAl, Third:PB3] Cardtype: Action Modifier Only usable during a referendum before votes are cast. Gain 1 pool. Any other Methuselah who votes in favor of and does not vote against the referendum gains 1 pool when the results of the referendum are tallied. Artist: Corey Macourek

The Lasombra

On Apr 23, 1:42 pm, librarian wrote: > What if you call a vote that will oust someone This was a more interesting scenario when you were "ousting LSJ", as in the subject.... >(Meth a calls KRC, Meth B has 3 pool left), and then put out a bribes. If Meth B votes for it, I > assume they are not ousted, because they will receive the pool for bribes > "when the results ... are tallied", and then take the 3 pool damage. You are right, they will not be ousted for the reasons you have specified. [ quoted text not captured ]

LSJ

On Apr 23, 2:06 pm, The Lasombra <thelasom...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 23, 1:42 pm, librarian wrote: > > > What if you call a vote that will oust someone > > This was a more interesting scenario when you were "ousting LSJ", as > in the subject.... > > >(Meth a calls KRC, Meth B has 3 pool left), and then put out a bribes. If Meth B votes for it, I > > assume they are not ousted, because they will receive the pool for bribes > > "when the results ... are tallied", and then take the 3 pool damage. > > You are right, they will not be ousted for the reasons you have > specified. Correct. [ quoted text not captured ]

Kushiel

On Apr 23, 2:06 pm, The Lasombra <thelasom...@hotmail.com> wrote: > This was a more interesting scenario when you were "ousting LSJ", as > in the subject.... Well, if there's a Bribes on it, I've got two in favor. John Eno