rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

A couple of questions

2 messages from 2 participants · 14 August 2002
original thread on Google Groups

Joshua Duffin

"Gomi no Sensei" <go...@panix.com> wrote in message news:aiukub$nf6$1...@panix3.panix.com... > Path won't reduce the 1 blood burned for Call's superior effect, since > that's not a cost. Cards that modify their cost in when played at superior > state it explicitly, as Venenation does. Call doesn't say the blood burning > is a cost, so it is not affected by Path. As a corollary, a vampire need > not have a blood to play Call, even at superior -- he can just fail to > burn the blood and fail to gain the superior effect, cycling the Call to > no purpose, if for some reason that's a good idea. Scott - is this last bit actually legal? I'm not quite clear on whether a vampire can play a card that says "This acting vampire burns 1 blood to..." when he has no blood. The blood burning isn't written as optional, but I'm not sure if that invalidates the playing of the card knowing it will fail. Josh called by the sleepy dead

LSJ

[ quoted text not captured ] Call of the Hungry Dead can only be used when there is a blocking minion, but you can play it at superior even if you're empty (for no effect). Why you would want to do so instead of playing it at inferior is another question. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/