rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

(Deck) Black Panthers

5 messages from 4 participants · 04 February 2008 – 06 February 2008
original thread on Google Groups

XZealot

Deck Name : Black Panthers Author : Norman S. Brown Jr Description : Crypt [12 vampires] Capacity min: 4 max: 9 average: 6.33333 ------------------------------------------------------------ 2x Gentha Shale 6 ANI PRE pot spi Ahrimane: 4 1x Iniko, The Black L 9 ANI OBT POT PRE cel Guruhi:4 1x Sobayifa 8 ANI PRE aus pot pro spi magaji Guruhi:3 1x Aren, Priest of Es 7 POT PRE ani obf Guruhi:4 1x Maskini 7 ANI POT PRE SER abo Guruhi:4 1x Urraca 7 ANI CEL POT pre bishop !Brujah:4 1x Batsheva 6 ANI PRE obt pot Guruhi:4 1x Sundown 6 ANI POT obf pre Nosferatu: 3 1x Fish 5 ANI POT pre Guruhi:4 1x Hezekiah Rutledge 5 PRE ani cel pot Brujah:4 1x Urenna Bunu 4 ani pot pre Guruhi:4 Library [90 cards] ------------------------------------------------------------ Action [24] 1x Fee Stake: Boston 1x Fee Stake: New York 1x Fee Stake: Perth 1x Fee Stake: Seattle 7x Founders of the Ebony Kingdom 7x Go Anarch 6x Legal Manipulations Action Modifier [16] 8x Bewitching Oration 8x Voter Captivation Combat [24] 5x Backstep 9x Carrion Crows 2x Stunt Cycle 6x Target Vitals 2x Thrown Sewer Lid Master [14] 1x Anarch Railroad 1x Dummy Corporation 2x Major Boon 7x Minion Tap 1x Potence 2x Seattle Committee Political Action [12] 5x Firebrand 7x Reckless Agitation Crafted with : Anarch Revolt Deck Builder. [Mon Feb 04 15:04:48 2008] Comments Welcome, Norman S. Brown, Jr XZealot Archon of the Swamp

BobbyDoc

Hi, With just 4 cards that require potence, I would skip the pot-angle and go for AidFromBats+CarrionCrows and maybe some HighGround as combat package instead of the present one. That would also open up for some smaller vamps as well (Zhara, Lumumba, Devyn for example). Also I think there are to many actions. I would definatly remove some FotEK and Legal's. Also adding 2 PB: LA is necessary imo. Cheers Robert

XZealot

On Feb 5, 7:50 am, BobbyDoc <robert_dokto...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > With just 4 cards that require potence, I would skip the pot-angle and > go for AidFromBats+CarrionCrows and maybe some HighGround as combat > package instead of the present one. That would also open up for some > smaller vamps as well (Zhara, Lumumba, Devyn for example). Actually, the minimization of potence is a point I should capitalize on. I think I will replace all the Legal Manipulations with Iron Glares. > Also I think there are to many actions. > I would definatly remove some FotEK and Legal's. > Also adding 2 PB: LA is necessary imo. While that may be true, 7 of the 24 actually untap you after you complete them and 5 of the 12 Political actions also create a permanent untap. So they are actions that enable more actions. There are more like 21 "Net Actions" in the deck once you remove all the actions that include an untap of some sort. [ quoted text not captured ]

Salem

BobbyDoc wrote: > I would definatly remove some FotEK and Legal's. That opens up a question. If your Guruhi has become an anarch, can it still play Founders of the Ebony Kingdom? FotEK requires you to target a "younger Laibon". Does this imply the acting vampire must also be a Laibon? or is "younger Laibon" shorthand for "younger vampire, who is a Laibon"? -- salem (replace 'hotmail' with 'yahoo' to email)

LSJ

Salem wrote: > That opens up a question. If your Guruhi has become an anarch, can it > still play Founders of the Ebony Kingdom? > > FotEK requires you to target a "younger Laibon". Does this imply the > acting vampire must also be a Laibon? No. > or is "younger Laibon" shorthand for "younger vampire, who is a Laibon"? Yes.