TOM: Restate official answer on using stolen weapons

In article <3rq37r$4...@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>, Thomas R Wylie (aa...@cats.ucsc.edu) wrote: >L. Scott Johnson <sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu> wrote: >>Nope. You can't use a weapon for a strike unless you started the round >>of combat with it. [DTR, I believe] > >Not correct. Stealing a weapon with first strike neutralizes any strike >just declared for it (unless that was at first strike to), but you could >fire that weapon later that round if you meet all the requirements. And later several posts pointed out that this was in direct opposition with the rulebook [15.3, p35]. (which I had mis-attributed to the DT). Never heard an answer as to whether this is official errata or not, tho. So, could you restate the official stance on using a stolen weapon in the same round of combat in which is was stolen, please? -- L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | These opinions are mine and http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | are subject to card text. Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rulemonger. |