[LSJ] Malkavian Prank Question.

Is it legal (both in tournament and in friendly play) to, while playing a Malkavian Prank to make a deal with one's grand predator or prey to purposely not choose the same numbers, to help them against your predator or prey? ~Shankar

[ quoted text not captured ] Since I can't sleep: Yes. Furthermore it is also legal to choose a number that is *not* 1, 2, 3, or 4 when guessing. (in case they don't trust you ;-) It's covered in another (recent) thread but I'm sure LSJ will be along to confirm it shortly ;-)

Timlagor wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 03:29:44 GMT, Shankar Gupta wrote: >>Is it legal (both in tournament and in friendly play) to, while playing a >>Malkavian Prank to make a deal with one's grand predator or prey to >>purposely not choose the same numbers, to help them against your predator or >>prey? >> > Since I can't sleep: Yes. > Furthermore it is also legal to choose a number that is *not* 1, 2, 3, or 4 > when guessing. (in case they don't trust you ;-) > > It's covered in another (recent) thread but I'm sure LSJ will be along to > confirm it shortly ;-) Correct. It is also legal to "agree" not to guess 4 and then guess 4 anyhow (either by design or by brain freeze). -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

In message <3EF1A29F...@white-wolf.com>, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> mumbled something about: >Timlagor wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 03:29:44 GMT, Shankar Gupta wrote: >>>Is it legal (both in tournament and in friendly play) to, while playing a >>>Malkavian Prank to make a deal with one's grand predator or prey to >>>purposely not choose the same numbers, to help them against your predator or >>>prey? >>> >> Since I can't sleep: Yes. >> Furthermore it is also legal to choose a number that is *not* 1, 2, 3, or 4 >> when guessing. (in case they don't trust you ;-) >> >> It's covered in another (recent) thread but I'm sure LSJ will be along to >> confirm it shortly ;-) > >Correct. > >It is also legal to "agree" not to guess 4 and then guess 4 anyhow (either >by design or by brain freeze). <raising hand> Guilty. -- "There's no gray. There's just white that's got grubby." -- T.P.

Derek Ray <lor...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<ifj3fvgdg8kc4bmd6...@4ax.com>... [ quoted text not captured ] "My Brother! <sob>" Set 'em up, knock 'em down.

legbiter wrote: :: Derek Ray <lor...@yahoo.com> wrote in message (lsj):::: It is also legal to "agree" not to guess 4 and then guess 4 :::: anyhow (either by design or by brain freeze). ::: ::: <raising hand> Guilty. :: :: "My Brother! <sob>" why not keep track of this "hall of shame" ? =)

"reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3ef2961b$0$20382$79c1...@nan-newsreader-01.noos.net>... [ quoted text not captured ] nominated in my top ten of inresponsible cards. After 4 pranks I ousted my prey's prey's prey in a seven player game. he couldn't handle a loss of 15 pool!!!!! Oortje

> nominated in my top ten of inresponsible cards. > After 4 pranks I ousted my prey's prey's prey in a seven player game. > he couldn't handle a loss of 15 pool!!!!! > > Oortje Serves him right for being greedy ;-)

[ quoted text not captured ] He probably thought that Oortje would try to give him pool rather then well, get him killed... =\ I should start adding a stupid saying on the bottom of all my post... "Life is like a box of chocolates; it starts off sweet, then you get pimples all over your face, and then you just get fat... " -- Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com http://web2news.com/?rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Oortje4ever wrote: :: nominated in my top ten of inresponsible cards. :: After 4 pranks I ousted my prey's prey's prey in a seven player :: game. he couldn't handle a loss of 15 pool!!!!! not to mention he also had a *predator* to deal with, in addition to your funky master cards...