davey! <dhat...@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> ravnos...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > Why [is] Army of Rats [not cumulative]?
>
> The latest card text of Army of Rats (the V:TES version) says so.
> I think LSJ mentioned it was also the original intent of the card.
Correct.
Note that there are other cards that are equally non-cumulative:
the Jyhad version of Pulse of Canaille, Torn Signpost, and Rumors
of Gehenna, for example.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and DCI (tournament) rules:
http://www.geocities.com/vtesrep
[ quoted text not captured ]